Nearly half (47%) of payments and remittance firms say compliance requirements are their biggest operational pressure, according to new poll findings from ClearNearly half (47%) of payments and remittance firms say compliance requirements are their biggest operational pressure, according to new poll findings from Clear

Stablecoin Settlement Models Face Compliance and Partner Hurdles, Finds Clear Junction

2026/03/23 08:00
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

WHY THIS MATTERS

Clear Junction’s findings highlight a key reality in the evolution of stablecoins: adoption is being held back less by technology and more by compliance and operational complexity. With 47% of firms citing regulatory requirements as their biggest pressure, it’s clear that documentation, monitoring, and partner expectations are shaping how—and how fast—digital assets can be integrated into real payment flows. This is particularly important in remittances, where reliability, transparency and regulatory alignment are non-negotiable.

Nearly half (47%) of payments and remittance firms say compliance requirements are their biggest operational pressure, according to new poll findings from Clear Junction, a global provider of cross-border payments and banking services infrastructure for licensed financial institutions.

The findings come from a live audience poll conducted during Clear Junction’s recent webinar, “Stablecoins in remittance: where they fit in real payment flows,” attended by nearly 100 senior executives from remittance providers, fintechs and financial institutions, who discussed the practical realities of integrating digital assets into cross-border payment operations.

The webinar featured insights from Oliver Calma, Founder and CEO of remittance firm BCRemit, and William Lee, Manager at regulatory consultancy Thistle Initiatives, alongside Clear Junction’s Chief Growth Officer Denis Kalyapin. 

While stablecoins are increasingly discussed as a tool for improving liquidity and settlement efficiency, the results highlight that operational and regulatory realities still shape how quickly firms can adopt them.

Key findings from the poll include:

  • 47% of respondents identified compliance requirements – including documentation, monitoring and partner expectations – as their biggest operational pressure today.
  • 46% said partner and counterparty constraints are the biggest barrier to implementing hybrid settlement models using stablecoins.
  • 36% cited operational readiness challenges, including reconciliation, exception handling and support processes.
  • When asked what would increase trust in hybrid settlement models, 37% said strong audit trails and traceability reporting were the most important factor.
  • Half of respondents (50%) also highlighted the need for clearer delivery windows and transparency around which payment routes are used.

The results suggest that while interest in stablecoins continues to grow, operational controls, regulatory clarity and trusted partner networks remain crucial to real-world adoption.

Denis Kalyapin, Chief Growth Officer at Clear Junction, commented: “Stablecoins are increasingly appearing in treasury and liquidity discussions across the remittance industry, but the reality is that adoption isn’t purely a technology question. Firms need strong operational controls, transparent settlement processes and trusted partners to run these models at scale.

“What we’re seeing is a growing interest in hybrid payment models – where digital assets are used alongside traditional rails like SEPA or Faster Payments to improve liquidity and settlement efficiency. But to make this credible, institutions need clear governance frameworks, strong reconciliation processes and the ability to track transactions across every stage of the flow.”

Hybrid settlement models – where stablecoins are used within treasury or liquidity layers while traditional payment rails handle pay-ins and payouts – are increasingly being explored by remittance providers seeking to optimise cross-border settlement times. However, operators must ensure operational readiness, compliance frameworks and partner alignment are firmly in place before introducing digital asset infrastructure into production payment flows.

Clear Junction works with regulated financial institutions, remittance providers and fintechs to support cross-border payment operations, offering access to accounts, domestic payment rails, FX services and digital asset infrastructure through a single API integration.

As stablecoins continue to evolve within the payments ecosystem, the company believes that hybrid settlement models – combining digital assets with established payment rails – will play a growing role in improving global liquidity and cross-border payment efficiency.

FF NEWS TAKE
Stablecoins may promise faster, cheaper cross-border payments—but compliance is still the gatekeeper.

The industry is clearly moving toward hybrid settlement models, but this transition will only succeed if firms can match innovation with strong governance and operational discipline. The winners in this space won’t just be those with the best technology, but those that can integrate it seamlessly into regulated, real-world payment environments.

The post Stablecoin Settlement Models Face Compliance and Partner Hurdles, Finds Clear Junction appeared first on FF News | Fintech Finance.

Market Opportunity
Falcon Finance Logo
Falcon Finance Price(FF)
$0.07245
$0.07245$0.07245
+0.19%
USD
Falcon Finance (FF) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.