Bitrefill has released a comprehensive report on a security breach that occurred on March 1, and it believes it to be the work of the North Korean hacking groupBitrefill has released a comprehensive report on a security breach that occurred on March 1, and it believes it to be the work of the North Korean hacking group

Bitrefill blames North Korean hackers for March 1 exploit, commits to cover losses

2026/03/18 07:35
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Bitrefill has released a comprehensive report on a security breach that occurred on March 1, and it believes it to be the work of the North Korean hacking group called the Lazarus Group. 

The Lazarus Group was also responsible for the largest single heist in crypto history when it hit Bybit early last year for more than $1 billion.

The company was transparent about how the incident occurred, but it did not disclose the exact amount stolen. Bitrefill claims its network was accessed through the compromised laptop of an employee, resulting in several hot wallets being drained. 

Did Bitrefill hide that it got hacked?  

Bitrefill has released a comprehensive post-mortem regarding a security breach that began on March 1. The company formally blamed the attack on the North Korean hacking group known as Lazarus Group or Bluenoroff because of the evidence it examined, based on the specific malware used, the modus operandi of the attackers, on-chain tracing of stolen funds, and the reuse of specific IP and email addresses previously linked to North Korean operations.

The incident began when an employee’s laptop was compromised and used as an initial point of entry for the hackers to gain access to a legacy credential. This credential granted the attackers access to a snapshot of the company’s systems that contained production secrets. 

With these secrets in hand, the Lazarus Group was then able to spread its access across Bitrefill’s infrastructure. They eventually reached parts of the company database and several cryptocurrency hot wallets.

Bitrefill’s security team first noticed the breach through “suspicious purchasing patterns” involving their suppliers. The attackers were exploiting the company’s gift card stock and supply lines. 

Simultaneously, the company realized that funds were being drained from their hot wallets and moved to wallets controlled by the attackers. 

In response, Bitrefill immediately took all systems offline to contain the threat, but due to the fact that the company’s global e-commerce network has thousands of products and dozens of suppliers, the process of safely shutting down and rebooting the infrastructure took over two weeks. 

How much was stolen during the Bitrefill breach?

Bitrefill’s investigation revealed that the hackers were not very interested in stealing customer data; not that they would have been able to. The company emphasized that its business model is designed to store very little personal information. It does not require mandatory “Know Your Customer” (KYC) documentation for most users, and data provided for higher-tier verification is managed by an external provider and was not stored on the systems that were breached.

However, the attackers did access approximately 18,500 purchase records. These records included customer email addresses, cryptocurrency payment addresses, and metadata such as IP addresses. 

About 1,000 of Bitrefill’s customers who had to provide names for specific products had their data encrypted. However, because the hackers may have accessed the encryption keys, Bitrefill is treating that data as potentially compromised and has already emailed those affected.

Regarding financial losses, Bitrefill has announced that it will absorb the impact. Although hot wallets were drained, the company stated it remains well-funded and has been profitable for several years. All user balances remain safe and unaffected. 

Bitrefill worked with several high-profile security entities, including Zeroshadow, SEAL Org, and the Recoveris Team to map the movement of the stolen funds on the blockchain. They also assisted in the forensic cleanup of the company’s servers. 

Bitrefill has since tightened internal access controls to ensure a single compromise cannot lead to a full system breach. The company also improved its shutdown procedures to react faster to suspicious database requests.

The company also stated it is continuing to conduct thorough pentests (penetration tests) with external experts to find any remaining vulnerabilities. Currently, almost all services, including payments, stock replenishment, and account features have returned to normal. 

If you want a calmer entry point into DeFi crypto without the usual hype, start with this free video.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Royal Government of Bhutan Moves 973 BTC in Latest Treasury Activity

Royal Government of Bhutan Moves 973 BTC in Latest Treasury Activity

The post Royal Government of Bhutan Moves 973 BTC in Latest Treasury Activity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Royal Government of Bhutan transferred 973
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/18 19:29
Bubblemaps: The top five traders in STBL token trading volume are interconnected and have made profits exceeding $10 million

Bubblemaps: The top five traders in STBL token trading volume are interconnected and have made profits exceeding $10 million

PANews reported on September 18th that blockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps published an article on the X platform claiming that Tether co-founder Reeve Collins had just launched a new token, STBL. However, the top five traders are suspiciously interconnected and have profited over $10 million. Collins launched STBL yesterday, a new stablecoin system built around three tokens: USST (stablecoin), YLD (yield token supporting USST), and STBL (governance token). An analysis of the top five traders by STBL trading volume revealed that these five profit-makers received capital injections at the same time. Tracing the source of their funds revealed a clear connection: the funds all came from the same source (injected via Tornado Cash); bots were used to borrow USDC from the Venus Protocol; and the total profit exceeded $10 million. However, there is no evidence that these traders are connected to the core team. In fact, this group of bots has a history of extracting value from other tokens, not just STBL.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 10:09
Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

US-based crypto exchange Coinbase has made a significant appeal to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a wave of lawsuits aimed at its operations. The company is urging federal action to address what it describes as an “increasingly fragmented and hostile” regulatory landscape for the crypto market. Coinbase Urges Federal Action  In a recent letter, Coinbase highlighted the steps taken by the current Administration to create a more equitable framework for digital asset regulation. This includes the introduction of stablecoin legislation and two pending bipartisan market-structure bills aimed at fostering uniformity in the oversight of cryptocurrencies.  Coinbase argues that these initiatives have begun to mitigate the adverse effects of the previous Administration’s enforcement-driven regulatory approach.  However, the company warns that certain states are perpetuating this problematic trend by adopting “expansive and flawed” interpretations of securities laws and implementing new licensing requirements that undermine the federal government’s pro-innovation stance. Related Reading: REX Shares Claims Its DOGE And XRP Spot ETFs Will Be Approved By US SEC Tomorrow They make an example with the Oregon Attorney General, who has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, claiming that many digital assets traded on its platform qualify as alleged unregistered securities.  The letter affirms that the suit not only targets Coinbase but also encourages other states to address what the Attorney General perceives as a regulatory gap left by federal authorities.  Similarly, the New York Attorney General has initiated legal action to regulate transactions involving digital assets based on decentralized protocols as securities, further complicating the regulatory environment. Coinbase has faced cease-and-desist orders from four states, which demand the company halt its retail staking services. These orders are deemed by Coinbase as “legally unfounded and inconsistent.” Unified Framework For Digital Assets In light of these challenges, the letter to the DOJ calls for urgent federal intervention to establish broad preemption provisions. The crypto exchange argues that preemption has historically been an effective tool for addressing state interference in national markets, referencing past Congressional actions. Coinbase contends that the current patchwork of state regulations not only disrupts market efficiency but also leads to unequal access to cryptocurrency services based on geographic location. Related Reading: Citi’s Ethereum Forecast: No New All-Time High Expected, Year-End Target At $4,300 To remedy these issues, Coinbase advocates for Congress to adopt legislation that would exempt federally regulated digital assets from state blue-sky laws and clarify that state licensing requirements do not apply to crypto intermediaries.  Additionally, the company urges the SEC to expedite rulemaking and provide clearer guidance on why digital asset transactions and services, including staking, should not be classified as securities. Such clarity would help prevent states from imposing conflicting regulations based on their interpretations of securities laws. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 15:00