The post Lime co-founder Brad Bao named in $100M federal RICO lawsuit over alleged Cere Network crypto fraud appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Brad Bao, co-founderThe post Lime co-founder Brad Bao named in $100M federal RICO lawsuit over alleged Cere Network crypto fraud appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Brad Bao, co-founder

Lime co-founder Brad Bao named in $100M federal RICO lawsuit over alleged Cere Network crypto fraud

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Brad Bao, co-founder of the $2.4 billion electric scooter company Lime, has been named as a defendant in a federal racketeering lawsuit alleging he participated in a cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme that defrauded retail investors out of tens of millions of dollars.

According to the 41-page complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 3:26-cv-00857), investor Vivian Liu and her company Goopal Digital Ltd. are seeking $100 million in compensatory and punitive damages from Bao, Cere Network CEO Fred Jin, and several other individuals and corporate entities.

The case centers on Cere Network, a blockchain-based decentralized data cloud platform that raised approximately $42.96 million from over 5,000 retail investors, many of whom were U.S.-based and purchased tokens through the Republic platform under Regulation D.

Alleged insider sell-off and token collapse

The complaint alleges that lead defendant Fred Jin publicly represented ahead of the initial coin offering in November 2021 that insider token holdings would remain locked and only vest over a period of months. According to the filing, the opposite occurred: on the day of the ICO, Jin and his associates transferred large quantities of tokens to exchanges including HTX and Kucoin and sold aggressively over the following weeks.

The Cere token reached an all-time high of $0.47 on launch day before collapsing to $0.06 by December 31, 2021. It currently trades at approximately $0.0012, a decline of 99.7% from its peak. The total proceeds from the alleged insider sell-off came to approximately $41.78 million, according to the filing.

The complaint traces the alleged proceeds through intermediate wallets and into a network of shell companies and personal accounts controlled by Jin, his wife Maren Schwarzer, and his brother Xin Jin, spanning entities in Delaware, the British Virgin Islands, Panama, and Germany. An additional $16.6 million was allegedly siphoned from corporate wallets and lost in speculative DeFi investments.

Bao’s alleged role and prior litigation

The complaint identifies Bao as a Cere Network board member who received director’s fees and an early token allocation. As the co-founder of Lime, his involvement carried significant weight with prospective investors, the filing states.

The plaintiffs allege Bao approved transactions designed to funnel investor funds into personal accounts controlled by Jin and failed to act on accounting irregularities that should have raised concerns.

Bao has faced prior litigation, including a fraud action involving the City of San Francisco and a separate lawsuit brought by venture firm Khosla Ventures alleging fraud and intentional interference tied to a collapsed $30 million acquisition deal.

Gotbit connection and wash trading allegations

The lawsuit also alleges that Jin and his associates engaged Gotbit Ltd., a crypto market-making firm, to deploy automated trading bots that conducted wash trading, generating fake volume to disguise the insider sell-off.

Gotbit’s founder, Alex Andryunin, was subsequently convicted of wire fraud and market manipulation as part of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Operation Token Mirrors, a federal sting operation targeting crypto market manipulation.

Investor claims and alleged pattern of conduct

Plaintiff Vivian Liu alleges she was recruited by Jin in 2019 to work for and invest in Cere Network, with promises of returns through the company and the Cere token. Liu claims she was owed 20 million tokens and Goopal was owed 33.3 million tokens — a combined value of approximately $25 million at the ICO peak price. Neither party ever received their tokens, according to the filing.

The complaint further alleges Jin’s pattern of conduct predates Cere Network, citing his involvement in mobile gaming company Funler in 2015 and education-blockchain platform Bitlearn in 2017, both characterized as precursors to the same scheme.

The suit asserts claims under RICO, RICO conspiracy, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of advisory and token sale agreements.

In addition to Bao and Jin, the named defendants include Maren Schwarzer, Xin Jin, Cere CMO Martijn Broersma, director François Granade, and corporate entities Cerebellum Network Inc., Interdata Network Ltd., and CEF AI Inc.

The plaintiffs are represented by John K. Ly and Jennifer L. Chor of Liang Ly LLP. The case is Goopal Digital Limited et al. v. Fred Jin et al., Case No. 3:26-cv-00857, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

The full federal complaint is available here.

Featured image via AngeloS4444 / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Source: https://finbold.com/lime-co-founder-brad-bao-named-in-100m-federal-rico-lawsuit-over-alleged-cere-network-crypto-fraud/

Market Opportunity
Cere Network Logo
Cere Network Price(CERE)
$0.0002435
$0.0002435$0.0002435
0.00%
USD
Cere Network (CERE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
U.S. inflation expectations diverge across March surveys

U.S. inflation expectations diverge across March surveys

The post U.S. inflation expectations diverge across March surveys appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. No official source confirms 3.4% to 3.7% March shift Claims
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/14 01:49
XRP Price Prediction Surges as Investment Products Climb 508% to $3.7 Billion in AUM Outpacing Bitcoin Ethereum and Solana While Pepeto Captures Every Institutional Dollar That XRP’s Dominance Attracts

XRP Price Prediction Surges as Investment Products Climb 508% to $3.7 Billion in AUM Outpacing Bitcoin Ethereum and Solana While Pepeto Captures Every Institutional Dollar That XRP’s Dominance Attracts

XRP investment products surged 508% in 2025 to $3.7 billion in assets under management. This outpaced inflows into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana products during
Share
Techbullion2026/03/14 02:38