On Tuesday, assets associated with the infamous Libra token were unfrozen at the behest of a Manhattan federal judge who refused to tag the defendants “evasive actors” because they have been on their best behavior.  U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon froze $57.6 million worth of USDC in June as part of a case in […]On Tuesday, assets associated with the infamous Libra token were unfrozen at the behest of a Manhattan federal judge who refused to tag the defendants “evasive actors” because they have been on their best behavior.  U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon froze $57.6 million worth of USDC in June as part of a case in […]

Judge unblocks crypto assets belonging to Hayden Davis and Ben Chow in LIBRA case

2025/08/21 05:50
3 min read

On Tuesday, assets associated with the infamous Libra token were unfrozen at the behest of a Manhattan federal judge who refused to tag the defendants “evasive actors” because they have been on their best behavior. 

U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon froze $57.6 million worth of USDC in June as part of a case in which the plaintiffs are seeking over $100 million in damages.

Why did the judge lift the freeze requirement?

The frozen assets were in two wallets controlled by defendants Hayden Davis, CEO of venture capital firm Kelsier Labs LLC, and Ben Chow, founder of decentralized exchange Meteora. Rochon claims both of them have been compliant with the court proceedings so far.

That compliance is ultimately why she decided to lift the freeze requirement on the $57.6 million worth of USDC on Tuesday. However, as she did so, she also expressed skepticism about the likelihood of the plaintiffs, who are represented by Burwick Law, succeeding in their case even though it is still in an early phase.

The plaintiffs claim that Davis and Chow misled investors by promoting the Libra Solana meme coin (LIBRA) with the social media post from President Milei in a bid to make the token look legit.

Chow’s lawyer, Samson Enzer of Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, has denied the plaintiffs’ claims, tagging them “untested and meritless.”

Hayden Davis and Ben Chow are trying to clear their names

The legal battle is unfolding months after the scandal of the LIBRA token, which surged to a $1.17 billion market capitalization before crashing down 97% to $33 million within 24 hours.

Upon launch, LIBRA was touted by Argentine President Javier Milei as a funding tool for small businesses in the South American country, encouraging many traders to ape in.

There was little reason to believe it was a scam, as around that time, the Central African Republic launched a national meme coin, and the President of the United States created his own official meme coin.

Unfortunately, the story they sold was a lie as Libra wasn’t the official token of Argentina, and allegations of insider trading started to circulate, prompting Milei to delete his post, and it all went downhill from there.

Davis attempted some damage control, even going on a media campaign to explain what had happened. It was a mistake as he soon became the face of the Libra scandal, with many investors pointing fingers at him for the collapse.

Davis presented himself as President Milei’s advisor, claiming his role with Libra was to act as a custodian of the associated funds—a role that left him bag holding $100 million.

Chow of Meteora was implicated because he referred a “handful” of projects to Davis’ Kelsier Labs, including First Lady Melania Trump’s official meme coin. Meteora’s infrastructure was also used to launch Libra.

The scandal led to Chow’s exit from Meteora. Six months later, both are still trying to clear their names. While they do that, Milei continues to distance himself from the scandal.

In May, Milei dissolved a task force investigating his role in the controversial Libra meme coin launch. According to documents published on the government’s website, the task force completed its investigation even though it did not reveal the details of its findings to the public.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Market Opportunity
Tagger Logo
Tagger Price(TAG)
$0.0002606
$0.0002606$0.0002606
-2.25%
USD
Tagger (TAG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15