The post LTC Technical Analysis Feb 9 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LTC’s 24-hour trading volume is trading below recent averages at 157.66 million dollarsThe post LTC Technical Analysis Feb 9 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LTC’s 24-hour trading volume is trading below recent averages at 157.66 million dollars

LTC Technical Analysis Feb 9

LTC’s 24-hour trading volume is trading below recent averages at 157.66 million dollars; this situation indicates decreasing market participation in the downtrend, giving possible accumulation signals. Despite the price remaining weak below EMA20, the weakness in volume suggests that selling pressure is decreasing and large players are accumulating positions.

Volume Profile and Market Participation

The current volume profile for Litecoin (LTC) shows a significant decrease in market participation compared to recent weeks. The 24-hour volume is at the 157.66 million dollar level, while the 7-day average volume was around the 250-300 million dollar range. This low volume, especially as the price declines to $54.36 within the downtrend, provides clues that sellers’ strength is exhausted.

From a market participation perspective, the thinning of volumes during downward movements is noteworthy. For example, over the last 3 days, while the price experienced a drop of more than 5%, volume decreased by 30%. This does not fit the definition of ‘healthy decline volume’; on the contrary, weak participation indicates that the declines are not sustainable. In upward attempts, volume shows a slight increase but still remains below average. This profile suggests that retail investors are on the sidelines, while institutional players are quietly accumulating positions.

In the volume profile, Value Area High (VAH) is around $55, Value Area Low (VAL) is positioned near the $52.80 support level. POC (Point of Control) is concentrated at $53.50; this level, as the point of most intense trading volume, can act as a strong magnet. Overall, the low-volume consolidation reflects the market sentiment in a ‘wait-and-see’ mode.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

The strongest signal in favor of accumulation is that volume does not confirm the new lows in price. With RSI at 29.75 in the oversold region, the decrease in volume forms a classic bullish divergence. Over the last week, the price tested below EMA20 ($61.52) three times, but volume did not peak each time – on the contrary, it stayed low. This shows that large players (whales) are looking for buying opportunities instead of selling.

Additionally, in the MTF (Multi-Timeframe) volume context, there are 4 strong levels (2S/3R) on 1D and 3D timeframes; these stand out as accumulation zones at $52.83 and $45.07 supports. The price approaching these supports without volume increase supports the tendency of smart money to accumulate at cheap levels. If we see a sudden volume spike, accumulation can be confirmed.

Distribution Risks

Although distribution risk is low, it should not be completely ignored. With Supertrend bearish and MACD showing negative histogram, if volume increases at $55.02 resistance (especially with weak volume on upside breakout), there is a possibility of a trap rally. The +0.50% change in the last 24 hours occurred with low volume; if rejection at this resistance happens with high volume, it could signal distribution. Dominance of 3 resistance levels on the 1W timeframe reminds of institutional selling pressure.

Price-Volume Harmony

There is a clear divergence between price action and volume. While the downtrend continues and price makes new lows (approaching $52.83), volume does not confirm the decline – on the contrary, it decreases. This ‘unhealthy down volume’ indicates that the trend is exhausted. Conversely, although volume slightly increases in short-term recoveries, it is not sufficient for an EMA20 breakout.

RSI divergence is supported by volume: While price falls, RSI stays stable, and volume thins. This combination emphasizes that price is not following volume, thus carrying potential for a major reversal. For a healthy bullish move, volume at $55 resistance needs to reach 200M+ levels.

Large Player Activity

Institutional activity patterns can be read from the volume profile, even if not supported by on-chain data. Low-volume declines imply that whales are not aggressively selling; on the contrary, they are gathering liquidity. LTC’s 8 strong MTF levels (mostly resistance), may indicate institutional order blocks. The $52.83 support, with a high score (74/100), stands like a defense line for large buyers.

Spike volumes are rare recently; this shows that large players are in stealth mode. If BTC stays stable, a sudden volume explosion in LTC could trigger institutional FOMO. However, exact positions cannot be known – patterns favor accumulation.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $70,084 with -0.96% decline in downtrend; Supertrend bearish and rising dominance risky for altcoins. LTC correlates 0.85% with BTC; if BTC breaks $69,949 support, LTC will be dragged to $52.83. Conversely, if BTC surpasses $72,183 resistance, volume increase expected in LTC – key levels: BTC support $65,843, resistance $72,183. LTC accumulation remains weak without BTC recovery; stay cautious.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook has a short-term bullish bias: Low-volume downtrend exhaustion sets up accumulation with oversold RSI. Target: $55.02 breakout to $59.76, then $87.49. Bearish scenario: BTC crash to $45.07, extreme $26.40. Wait for volume confirmation on LTC Spot Analysis and LTC Futures Analysis. General advice: Volume increase at $52.83 is green light for longs.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/ltc-technical-analysis-february-9-2026-volume-and-accumulation

Market Opportunity
Litecoin Logo
Litecoin Price(LTC)
$53.44
$53.44$53.44
-1.78%
USD
Litecoin (LTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
VIRTUAL Bearish Analysis Feb 10

VIRTUAL Bearish Analysis Feb 10

The post VIRTUAL Bearish Analysis Feb 10 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. VIRTUAL is approaching a critical support test at the 0.55$ level, with RSI at 33
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/10 15:15
XRPL Developer Says 100% Taking Profits on XRP at $10, $27

XRPL Developer Says 100% Taking Profits on XRP at $10, $27

An XRPL developer has stirred discussion around profit-taking levels well above today’s price, prompting mixed reactions from XRP holders who favor a never-sell
Share
Coinstats2026/02/10 15:11