Chainlink price has accelerated into a major historical support zone at $9.65 after losing key value levels, placing the market at a critical inflection point whereChainlink price has accelerated into a major historical support zone at $9.65 after losing key value levels, placing the market at a critical inflection point where

Chainlink price retests August 2024 support at $9.65: Relief bounce next?

4 min read

Chainlink price has accelerated into a major historical support zone at $9.65 after losing key value levels, placing the market at a critical inflection point where a relief bounce may develop if demand returns.

Summary
  • LINK accelerated lower after losing value area high near $21
  • Price is retesting strong August 2024 and multi-year support at $9.65
  • Bullish volume could fuel a relief rally toward the POC and $21 resistance

Chainlink (LINK) price action has entered a decisive technical zone after an aggressive corrective move to the downside. Following the loss of key volume-based support earlier in the cycle, LINK has rapidly rotated lower and is now retesting a historically significant support level that last held firm in August 2024.

This region around $9.65 represents not only a higher-timeframe demand zone, but also an area where price has repeatedly triggered bullish reactions in the past.

  • Impulsive sell-off after losing value area high: The breakdown below $21 accelerated downside momentum.
  • $9.65 marks multi-year and August 2024 support: Strong historical demand exists at this level.
  • Bullish volume needed for confirmation: Any relief rally depends on renewed buyer participation.
Chainlink price retests August 2024 support at $9.65: Relief bounce next? - 1

The current corrective phase on LINK began once the price lost acceptance below the value area high, which was situated near the $21 region.

This level previously served as a balance point between buyers and sellers, and its failure signaled a shift in control toward sellers.

Once value was lost, price transitioned from a balanced auction environment into a trending corrective move, resulting in accelerated selling pressure.

As is typical in such scenarios, LINK did not spend much time consolidating below the value area high. Instead, price moved swiftly through lower liquidity zones, targeting the next major area of historical interest.

This behavior reflects a lack of meaningful demand between $21 and the current support, reinforcing the importance of the $9.65 region as a potential stopping point for the decline.

Why the $9.65 level matters

The $9.65 level stands out as a critical support zone for several reasons. First, it represents a higher-timeframe support that has been defended multiple times over the past market cycles. Each prior interaction with this region has led to a bullish response, ranging from short-term relief rallies to more sustained upside rotations.

Second, the value area low is in close confluence with this level, increasing its technical relevance. When price reaches the value area low after an impulsive move, it often signals that the market has explored the lower boundary of fair value. At this stage, two outcomes are typically observed: either strong demand enters the market, leading to mean reversion, or price fails to attract buyers and continues into deeper discount zones.

Finally, the $9.65 area carries psychological importance as a long-standing reference point for market participants. Levels with this degree of historical interaction tend to attract attention from longer-term buyers, increasing the probability of at least a temporary reaction.

Upside targets a relief rally scenario

Should LINK successfully hold above $9.65 and attract sustained buying interest, the next upside targets are clearly defined. The first area of interest sits near the point of control (POC), where the highest volume has previously traded.

A move back toward the POC would represent a classic mean reversion following an impulsive sell-off.

Beyond that, the $21.07 resistance level stands out as a major higher-timeframe objective. This zone aligns closely with the previously lost value area high and would likely act as a significant test for any recovery attempt.

While a move from $9.65 to $21 would still be considered corrective within the broader structure, it would represent a substantial relief rally and a meaningful reset in market conditions.

What to expect in the coming price action

From a technical, price-action, and market-structure perspective, LINK is currently at a major decision point.

The $9.65 support level has strong historical significance and has previously produced bullish reactions, giving the market a credible foundation for a relief bounce.

If bullish volume begins to flow and price consolidates above this support, a rotation toward the POC and potentially the $21.07 resistance becomes increasingly likely.

Conversely, failure to attract demand would weaken the bullish case and expose LINK to further downside risk.

For now, all eyes remain on how price behaves at this long-term support, as the next sessions are likely to determine whether LINK stages a relief rally or continues its broader corrective trend.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15