CrossCurve has confirmed that its cross-chain bridge is under active attack after a missing validation check allowed spoofed cross-chain messages to pass throughCrossCurve has confirmed that its cross-chain bridge is under active attack after a missing validation check allowed spoofed cross-chain messages to pass through

CrossCurve Confirms Active Bridge Exploit Across Multiple Networks

2026/02/03 00:04
5 min read

CrossCurve has confirmed that its cross-chain bridge is under active attack after a missing validation check allowed spoofed cross-chain messages to pass through its system.

The vulnerability enabled attackers to drain funds directly from the protocol’s PortalV2 contract, with onchain data showing losses of roughly $3 million spread across multiple blockchain networks.

The team publicly acknowledged the exploit and urged users to immediately pause all interactions with the platform while emergency investigations continue.

CrossCurve, formerly known as EYWA, is a Curve-backed interoperability project supported by Curve founder Michael Egorov and previously raised approximately $7 million in funding.

The confirmation marks yet another reminder of how cross-chain bridges remain one of the most targeted and vulnerable components of DeFi infrastructure.

Validation Flaw Lets Spoofed Messages Drain PortalV2 Funds

According to CrossCurve’s initial technical findings, the exploit originated from a missing validation check in the bridge’s message verification process.

This flaw allowed attackers to craft fraudulent cross-chain instructions that appeared legitimate to the protocol, enabling unauthorized withdrawals without triggering internal safeguards.

Once the spoofed messages passed through the system, the attacker systematically drained assets held within the PortalV2 contract across several connected networks.

Bridge exploits have become a dominant attack vector in crypto over the past two years, largely because they hold pooled liquidity designed to move assets between chains quickly, creating massive single points of failure.

In CrossCurve’s case, the exploit did not require breaching smart contract logic directly. Instead, it abused the messaging layer that coordinates asset movement across ecosystems.

The team has since frozen the exploited bridge and launched a full forensic review to understand exactly how the validation mechanism was bypassed.

Hacker Drains EYWA Tokens But Cannot Liquidate Them

One of the largest assets affected by the breach was EYWA, CrossCurve’s native token.

The attacker extracted 999,787,453.03 EYWA tokens onto the Ethereum network, but the team quickly clarified that these tokens are effectively trapped and cannot be sold or circulated.

Despite EYWA launching originally on Ethereum, its entire circulating supply was migrated to Arbitrum during the token generation event.

As a result:

• There are no DEX liquidity pools for EYWA on Ethereum

• The only centralized exchange that supported Ethereum-network EYWA froze deposits

• The exploited bridge has been frozen to block further movement

In practical terms, the stolen EYWA tokens now sit isolated on Ethereum with no route to exit, trade, or impact circulating supply.

CrossCurve emphasized that all EYWA held on Arbitrum remains fully safe, and users can continue swapping and trading normally on both decentralized and centralized exchanges.

To reinforce containment, the team also contacted major trading platforms, including KuCoin, Gate, MEXC, BingX, and BitMart, to ensure the attacker has zero opportunity to liquidate any stolen tokens.

Other Tokens Successfully Drained From The Bridge

While the EYWA portion of the exploit remains neutralized, the hacker did manage to successfully extract a range of other assets from the bridge infrastructure.

The stolen token volumes include:

3CRV, 2,578.22

USDT, 815,361

WETH, 123.59

CRV, 239,889.64

2CRV, 2,421.92

USDC, 34,820.73

WBTC, 2.64

USDB, 10,288.43

c(USD)CT, 4,199.24

frxUSD, 1,064.99

In market value terms, losses were split between:

• $110,194.49 from CrossCurve liquidity pools

• $1,331,697.82 from the Units blockchain

This brings the confirmed total to $1,441,892.31 in assets that were successfully removed and remain under attacker control.

While smaller than some recent bridge exploits, the breach still represents a major security incident for a growing interoperability protocol.

Exchanges Freeze Deposits As Investigation Intensifies

CrossCurve has moved aggressively to limit any potential downstream damage from the exploit.

Beyond freezing the compromised bridge, the team coordinated directly with centralized exchanges to ensure stolen assets cannot be deposited, swapped, or laundered through trading platforms.

This rapid response significantly reduces the attacker’s ability to realize profits, a tactic that has increasingly become standard practice in modern DeFi incident containment.

At the same time, CrossCurve has launched a full investigation to determine:

• The exact exploit pathway

• Whether additional vulnerabilities exist

• How to permanently harden validation mechanisms

• What long-term protocol upgrades are required

The team has also issued a 72-hour window for the attacker to initiate contact regarding a potential return of stolen funds, a common approach in DeFi incidents that sometimes results in partial or full recovery.

Meanwhile, blockchain forensic tracking is actively mapping associated wallets and transaction flows to identify the attacker’s broader network.

Another Warning Sign For Cross-Chain Bridge Security

The CrossCurve exploit adds to a growing list of bridge-focused attacks that continue to drain hundreds of millions from the crypto ecosystem each year.

While smart contract auditing has improved across DeFi, cross-chain messaging systems remain complex, fragmented, and difficult to fully secure, often involving offchain relayers, verification layers, and custom validation logic.

A single missing check, as seen in this incident, can expose massive pooled liquidity in seconds.

For protocols, this highlights the urgent need for:

• Formal verification of bridge logic

• Redundant validation systems

• Time delays on large cross-chain transfers

• Continuous real-time monitoring

• Segmented liquidity instead of single pools

For users, it reinforces that bridges remain among the highest-risk components of decentralized infrastructure, even when backed by experienced teams and major industry figures.

Although CrossCurve acted quickly to contain damage and protect user funds, the exploit underscores how fragile interoperability layers can be when even small implementation flaws exist.

As cross-chain activity continues to grow, security around validation mechanisms will likely become one of the most critical battlegrounds in DeFi’s next evolution.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15