Why the DAO Governance Vote Is Critical for Aave Price

AAVE fell 10% during the early hours of the Asian session on Monday, following a $50 million sell-off triggered by growing governance tensions.

The plunge comes amid allegations that Aave Labs, the company led by founder Stani Kulechov, redirected millions in swap fees from the DAO treasury without the approval of token holders, igniting debate over decentralized governance and founder control.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Amidst DAO governance drama and revenue controversy, the AAVE price has dropped by over 10% in the last 24 hours, trading at $159.86 as of this writing.

The controversy centers on Aave’s integration of CowSwap into its frontend, replacing ParaSwap. Critics claim that this shift, completed after Aave Labs received a grant from CowSwap, diverted up to $10 million in potential annual revenue away from the DAO.

An open letter from an Orbit delegate stated that the ParaSwap integration generated approximately $200,000 per week for the DAO.

DeFi community members argue that redirecting these fees undermines the DAO’s decentralized governance model.

Stani Kulechov and Aave Labs maintain that revenue from frontend operations is separate from core protocol revenue and has always been voluntary.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Nonetheless, questions remain over the CEO’s dual role and control of protocol assets, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

DAO Alignment Proposal Moves to Snapshot

To address the crisis, Kulechov moved a controversial DAO alignment proposal to Snapshot for a formal vote.

The plan aims to transfer key brand assets, including domains and social media handles, from Aave Labs to the DAO.

Sponsored

Sponsored

However, market confidence appears low. Polymarket odds indicate only a 25% chance of the proposal passing, a 26-point drop from earlier in the week.

Community members, such as Tulip King, have suggested that failing to pass the vote could push AAVE prices further down.

Sponsored

Market and Governance Implications

The episode highlights the broader challenges facing DAOs: aligning incentives among developers, service providers, and token holders while maintaining true decentralization.

Critics point to alternative models, such as Hyperliquid, where nearly all revenue is allocated toward token buybacks, and team compensation is paid in native tokens, as potential examples for Aave to follow.

The Snapshot vote requires a quorum of 320,000 YAE votes and a margin of at least 80,000 votes over rival options to pass. Voting will remain open for three days, giving token holders time to consider the protocol’s next steps.

In the meantime, the AAVE sell-off highlights the market’s concerns about governance transparency and whether token holders can trust that protocol revenues serve the DAO rather than private interests.

As the community heads to the polls, the outcome could set a significant precedent for Aave and the broader DeFi ecosystem.