According to new on-chain analysis, the market may already be in a bear phase – not because sellers are panicking, […] The post Bitcoin’s Bear Market May Have StartedAccording to new on-chain analysis, the market may already be in a bear phase – not because sellers are panicking, […] The post Bitcoin’s Bear Market May Have Started

Bitcoin’s Bear Market May Have Started Quietly, CryptoQuant Warns

2025/12/20 23:10

According to new on-chain analysis, the market may already be in a bear phase – not because sellers are panicking, but because demand is quietly drying up.

Key Takeaways
  • CryptoQuant says Bitcoin has already entered a bear phase driven by weakening demand, not panic selling.
  • Fading ETF inflows, slower growth among large holders, and falling derivatives funding point to a risk-off shift.
  • The firm sees $70,000 as a near-term downside zone, with $56,000 possible later if demand fails to recover.

The Cycle May Have Topped Without the Crowd Noticing

Data from CryptoQuant suggests that Bitcoin’s latest expansion phase has already consumed most of the buying power that fueled the rally since 2023. Rather than pointing to a single crash event, the firm argues that the cycle turned when demand growth slipped below its historical trend in early October 2025.

From CryptoQuant’s perspective, Bitcoin’s price cycles are driven less by supply mechanics and more by waves of demand. The most recent cycle, they say, was powered by three distinct forces: the launch of U.S. spot ETFs, political risk premiums tied to the U.S. election, and aggressive accumulation by corporate Bitcoin treasuries. With those forces now fading, price support is weakening beneath the surface.

Why This Doesn’t Look Like a Classic Crash

Instead of calling for a sudden collapse, CryptoQuant describes the current phase as a slow compression. When demand stops expanding, price can remain elevated for a time, but momentum eventually fades. That process, the firm says, is already visible.

Based on historical behavior, Bitcoin often gravitates toward the realized price during bear markets. That level currently sits near $56,000. A move to that zone would imply a drawdown of roughly 55% from the recent peak – still severe, but smaller than any previous cycle low. Before that, CryptoQuant sees an intermediate floor near $70,000, which could be tested within months if demand fails to recover.

Institutional Flows Are No Longer Helping

One of the clearest shifts has occurred in the ETF market. After acting as a major engine of demand earlier in the cycle, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs became net sellers in the final quarter of 2025. Combined holdings dropped by around 24,000 BTC, a stark reversal from the heavy accumulation seen a year earlier.

Large holder behavior is also changing. Wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC – a group that includes ETFs and treasury-focused firms – are growing more slowly than normal. CryptoQuant compares this pattern to late 2021, when similar stagnation preceded the 2022 bear market.

Derivatives and Long-Term Signals Are Turning Defensive

Leverage metrics are reinforcing the message. Funding rates in perpetual futures, averaged over a full year, have fallen to their lowest levels since late 2023. Historically, sustained declines in funding reflect reduced appetite for leveraged long exposure – a condition more consistent with bear markets than bull runs.

At the same time, Bitcoin has slipped below its 365-day moving average, a long-term trend line that has often separated expansion phases from contraction phases. CryptoQuant views sustained weakness below this level as confirmation that the market regime has changed.

When the Pressure Could Show Up in Price

CryptoQuant’s head of research, Julio Moreno, said the bear phase effectively began in mid-November, shortly after the massive liquidation event on Oct. 10. Since then, demand indicators have continued to deteriorate rather than stabilize.

READ MORE:

Cardano News: Network Set to Undergo Major Transformation

Moreno estimates that a move toward $70,000 could unfold over the next three to six months. A deeper slide toward $56,000 would likely be slower, potentially stretching into the second half of 2026 if no new demand catalysts emerge.

A View That Clashes With Wall Street Optimism

This outlook sharply contrasts with several bullish forecasts still circulating among major financial institutions. Citigroup continues to project much higher prices over the next year, while JPMorgan maintains an upside case based on Bitcoin’s comparison to gold.

Others have turned more cautious. Standard Chartered recently lowered its long-term targets, while Bitwise still believes new all-time highs are possible in 2026.

CryptoQuant’s argument cuts across all of those forecasts. In their framework, the key question is not how optimistic projections sound, but whether demand is expanding or contracting. Right now, the data points firmly toward contraction.

If that trend persists, Bitcoin’s next major move may not be driven by headlines or narratives, but by the simple absence of new buyers willing to step in at current prices.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Bitcoin’s Bear Market May Have Started Quietly, CryptoQuant Warns appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
MAY Logo
MAY Price(MAY)
$0.01196
$0.01196$0.01196
-0.41%
USD
MAY (MAY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14