The post Is Your Crypto Really Safe? SEC Warns Investors on Wallet and Custody Risks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR Hot wallets offer convenience butThe post Is Your Crypto Really Safe? SEC Warns Investors on Wallet and Custody Risks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR Hot wallets offer convenience but

Is Your Crypto Really Safe? SEC Warns Investors on Wallet and Custody Risks

2025/12/14 22:26

TLDR

  • Hot wallets offer convenience but face cyberattack and hacking risks.
  • Cold wallets are safer online but can be lost, stolen, or damaged.
  • Self-custody gives control but requires full responsibility for keys and seed phrases.
  • Third-party custodians hold keys but may rehypothecate or commingle assets.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released an investor bulletin detailing how retail investors can safely store and access crypto assets. 

The guide explains risks associated with different types of crypto wallets and custody methods, while providing actionable tips for protecting digital holdings.

The SEC stresses that crypto wallets themselves do not hold digital assets. Instead, they secure the private keys needed to access crypto holdings. 

Understanding the difference between hot and cold wallets, managing self-custody versus third-party custody, and protecting seed phrases are essential steps for safeguarding crypto investments.

Hot and Cold Wallets: Convenience Versus Security

Crypto wallets generate two cryptographic keys: a private key for authorizing transactions and a public key for receiving assets. 

Losing a private key means losing permanent access to the crypto in the wallet, making secure storage crucial.

Hot wallets are internet-connected, providing fast access for transactions. Their connectivity, however, exposes users to hacking, malware, and other cyber threats. 

Cold wallets are offline devices, such as USB drives or external hardware, offering higher security against online attacks. Physical loss or device damage, though, can permanently erase crypto assets.

Investors are also advised to store seed phrases securely. These backup phrases allow wallet recovery if private keys are lost or compromised. Failing to protect a seed phrase can lead to irreversible loss.

Choosing Between Self-Custody and Third-Party Custody

Self-custody gives investors full control over their crypto, but it comes with complete responsibility for securing private keys and seed phrases.

Setting up wallets, managing transactions, and protecting access requires technical knowledge and ongoing diligence.

Third-party custody involves delegating control to professional custodians, including crypto exchanges and specialized storage providers. 

These custodians handle private keys and may use combinations of hot and cold wallets. Investors must assess whether custodians rehypothecate or commingle assets and understand potential consequences.

Key questions when selecting a third-party custodian include the custodian’s security protocols, insurance coverage, fees, and regulatory status. 

Investors should confirm how assets are stored, who can access them, and what privacy protections are in place.

Practical Tips for Protecting Crypto Assets

The SEC bulletin emphasizes several steps for safeguarding crypto holdings. Investors should never share private keys or seed phrases, keep their asset information private, and remain alert to phishing scams. 

Using strong passwords and multi-factor authentication can further protect online accounts.

Researching custodians is essential to reduce risk. Understanding how third-party providers operate, including how they store and secure crypto assets, helps investors avoid unexpected losses. Monitoring wallet access and security practices, along with keeping digital and physical recovery methods safe, improves overall protection.

By understanding the risks of hot and cold wallets, self-custody, and third-party custody, investors can make informed decisions about safeguarding their digital assets. 

Awareness and careful management are key to ensuring crypto remains secure in a rapidly evolving market.

The post Is Your Crypto Really Safe? SEC Warns Investors on Wallet and Custody Risks appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/is-your-crypto-really-safe-sec-warns-investors-on-wallet-and-custody-risks/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

The post Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The lead developer of Shiba Inu, Shytoshi Kusama, has publicly addressed the Shibarium bridge exploit that occurred recently, draining $2.4 million from the network. After days of speculation about his involvement in managing the crisis, the project leader broke his silence. Kusama emphasized that a special “war room” has been set up to restore stolen finances and enhance network security. The statement is his first official words since the bridge compromise occurred. “Although I am focusing on AI initiatives to benefit all our tokens, I remain with the developers and leadership in the war room,” Kusama posted on social media platform X. He dismissed claims that he had distanced himself from the project as “utterly preposterous.” The developer said that the reason behind his silence at first was strategic. Before he could make any statements publicly, he must have taken time to evaluate what he termed a complex and deep situation properly. Kusama also vowed to provide further updates in the official Shiba Inu channels as the team comes up with long-term solutions. As highlighted in our previous article, targeted Shibarium’s bridge infrastructure through a sophisticated attack vector. Hackers gained unauthorized access to validator signing keys, compromising the network’s security framework. The hackers executed a flash loan to acquire 4.6 million BONE ShibaSwap tokens. The validator power on the network was majority held by them after this purchase. They were able to transfer assets out of Shibarium with this control. The response of Shibarium developers was timely to limit the breach. They instantly halted all validator functions in order to avoid additional exploitation. The team proceeded to deposit the assets under staking in a multisig hardware wallet that is secure. External security companies were involved in the investigation effort. Hexens, Seal 911, and PeckShield are collaborating with internal developers to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:46