Social media posts claiming that the OVP under Sara Duterte received the 'highest COA rating' for three consecutive years are misleadingSocial media posts claiming that the OVP under Sara Duterte received the 'highest COA rating' for three consecutive years are misleading

FACT CHECK: ‘Highest COA rating’ claim for OVP under Sara Duterte is misleading

2025/12/05 18:30

Claim: The Office of the Vice President under Sara Duterte has reportedly earned the top Commission on Audit (COA) rating for three years in a row.

Rating: MISLEADING

Why we fact-checked this: Posts claiming that the Office of the Vice President (OVP) under Sara Duterte has received the “highest [Commission on Audit] rating for three consecutive years” are circulating widely on social media.

These posts are framed in a way that suggest official recognition from COA for exceptional governance and financial management, which potentially influences public perception of the OVP’s performance. Some comments are already praising the OVP’s supposed streak of “top ratings.” One post in particular by News Ngayon, a Facebook fan page from Davao City, has garnered more than 41,000 reactions; 3,800 comments; and 4,400 shares.

Several of the viral posts also used headlines and captions such as “VP Sara, tatlong taon nang top audit performer” (VP Sara, top audit performer for three years) or “VP Sara Duterte, tatlong taon nang kumikilala ng top COA audit rating” (VP Sara Duterte, recognized with top COA audit rating for three years).

The captions describe the achievement as proof of Duterte’s integrity and good governance. The volume of shares and the authoritative framing of the posts create a high potential for misinformation.

The facts: Based on COA’s audit opinion guide, a “top audit rating” is not an official COA category, and creates a false impression of special recognition. They do not classify agencies on a scale, or rank them from highest to lowest. They only issue financial audit opinions between modified and unmodified opinions.

An unmodified or unqualified opinion means the financial statements are fairly presented as of audit date. It does not mean that every government program, every fund usage, every compliance matter or overall performance is fully verified or faultless.

Therefore, even if the OVP received unmodified opinions for CY 2022, 2023, and 2024, such a streak does not automatically equate to a guarantee of overall best practices across all aspects of governance. For context, COA also rendered clean audit opinions for consecutive years from previous terms of the OVP.

The Annual Audit Reports (AAR) for national government agencies is publicly available and can be viewed on COA’s official website.

Because many social media posts use “ top rating” and “top performer” when referring to COA’s financial audit opinion, COA warns about the risk of overstating or distorting what their audit actually means.

After receiving an unmodified audit, the OVP released a statement on Thursday, December 4, reporting that its management officials met with COA auditors during an exit conference on May 15, 2025 to discuss the significant audit observations and recommendations. They emphasized that the audit did not identify any loss or misuse of government funds or property during calendar year 2024. They also noted that, “all issues raised were primarily administrative in nature.”

COA opinions: COA issues different types of audits including financial, compliance, and performance audits. The audit opinion is part of the financial audit only.

The modified opinion includes qualified opinion or material misstatements of the financial statements, adverse opinion or pervasive material misstatements, and disclaimer of opinion or audit that cannot be completed due to insufficient evidence.

On the other hand, the unmodified opinion, also called unqualified or “clean” opinion, means that financial statements are fairly presented in all material respects. However, a clean opinion does not directly mean the agency has flawless operations.

In their clarification statement, COA wrote: “It is important to note that the financial statements represent only a facet of an agency and that an audit opinion does not provide any conclusions on the agency’s level of compliance with laws, rules and regulations, nor the application of the principles of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the agency’s operations.”

COA explained that matters related to efficiency, effectiveness, and compliance are addressed in COA’s compliance and performance audits, which are separate from the financial audit. – Princess Leah Sagaad/Rappler.com

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at factcheck@rappler.com. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

Market Opportunity
Factor Logo
Factor Price(FACT)
$1.2
$1.2$1.2
-1.63%
USD
Factor (FACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41