The post Metamask shield: $10K/mo loss protection appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MetaMask has launched a new premium safeguard called shield, designed to protect users from transaction-related losses while adding fast-response support. MetaMask introduces premium loss protection for on-chain activity MetaMask has rolled out Transaction Shield, a premium opt-in security upgrade that bundles transaction loss protection with 24/7 wallet priority support for its users. The product, announced on Dec. 2, 2025, aims to reduce the financial impact of risky interactions across decentralized applications and smart contracts. The new subscription service extends MetaMask’s security stack by offering coverage for losses up to $10,000 per month on transactions the platform classifies as safe. However, only actions that pass MetaMask’s automated contract checks and transaction simulations qualify for reimbursement if something goes wrong. Moreover, the company positions Transaction Shield as an added layer on top of its existing threat detection tools, instead of a replacement. That said, users still need to monitor approvals, contract interactions, and spending limits whenever they connect their wallet to on-chain services. Pricing, free trial, and subscription details The Transaction Shield MetaMask subscription service is priced at $9.99 per month or $99 annually, maintaining clear monthly coverage limits tied to approved transactions. Subscribers receive a 14-day free trial, and annual plans include a $20 discount compared with paying month to month. Currently, coverage is available only through the MetaMask Extension in desktop browsers. However, the team plans to extend the feature to the mobile wallet at a later stage, bringing the same transaction loss protection and support package to smartphone users. Supported networks and transaction types Transaction Shield applies to approved transactions on a wide range of supported blockchain networks. Covered chains include Ethereum, Linea, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BSC, and Sei, giving users protection across major EVM-compatible ecosystems. Moreover, the feature supports common DeFi and NFT interactions. Eligible actions… The post Metamask shield: $10K/mo loss protection appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MetaMask has launched a new premium safeguard called shield, designed to protect users from transaction-related losses while adding fast-response support. MetaMask introduces premium loss protection for on-chain activity MetaMask has rolled out Transaction Shield, a premium opt-in security upgrade that bundles transaction loss protection with 24/7 wallet priority support for its users. The product, announced on Dec. 2, 2025, aims to reduce the financial impact of risky interactions across decentralized applications and smart contracts. The new subscription service extends MetaMask’s security stack by offering coverage for losses up to $10,000 per month on transactions the platform classifies as safe. However, only actions that pass MetaMask’s automated contract checks and transaction simulations qualify for reimbursement if something goes wrong. Moreover, the company positions Transaction Shield as an added layer on top of its existing threat detection tools, instead of a replacement. That said, users still need to monitor approvals, contract interactions, and spending limits whenever they connect their wallet to on-chain services. Pricing, free trial, and subscription details The Transaction Shield MetaMask subscription service is priced at $9.99 per month or $99 annually, maintaining clear monthly coverage limits tied to approved transactions. Subscribers receive a 14-day free trial, and annual plans include a $20 discount compared with paying month to month. Currently, coverage is available only through the MetaMask Extension in desktop browsers. However, the team plans to extend the feature to the mobile wallet at a later stage, bringing the same transaction loss protection and support package to smartphone users. Supported networks and transaction types Transaction Shield applies to approved transactions on a wide range of supported blockchain networks. Covered chains include Ethereum, Linea, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BSC, and Sei, giving users protection across major EVM-compatible ecosystems. Moreover, the feature supports common DeFi and NFT interactions. Eligible actions…

Metamask shield: $10K/mo loss protection

MetaMask has launched a new premium safeguard called shield, designed to protect users from transaction-related losses while adding fast-response support.

MetaMask introduces premium loss protection for on-chain activity

MetaMask has rolled out Transaction Shield, a premium opt-in security upgrade that bundles transaction loss protection with 24/7 wallet priority support for its users. The product, announced on Dec. 2, 2025, aims to reduce the financial impact of risky interactions across decentralized applications and smart contracts.

The new subscription service extends MetaMask’s security stack by offering coverage for losses up to $10,000 per month on transactions the platform classifies as safe. However, only actions that pass MetaMask’s automated contract checks and transaction simulations qualify for reimbursement if something goes wrong.

Moreover, the company positions Transaction Shield as an added layer on top of its existing threat detection tools, instead of a replacement. That said, users still need to monitor approvals, contract interactions, and spending limits whenever they connect their wallet to on-chain services.

Pricing, free trial, and subscription details

The Transaction Shield MetaMask subscription service is priced at $9.99 per month or $99 annually, maintaining clear monthly coverage limits tied to approved transactions. Subscribers receive a 14-day free trial, and annual plans include a $20 discount compared with paying month to month.

Currently, coverage is available only through the MetaMask Extension in desktop browsers. However, the team plans to extend the feature to the mobile wallet at a later stage, bringing the same transaction loss protection and support package to smartphone users.

Supported networks and transaction types

Transaction Shield applies to approved transactions on a wide range of supported blockchain networks. Covered chains include Ethereum, Linea, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BSC, and Sei, giving users protection across major EVM-compatible ecosystems.

Moreover, the feature supports common DeFi and NFT interactions. Eligible actions include DeFi swaps, lending and borrowing activity, NFT mints, and NFT sales on trusted marketplaces, as well as verified airdrop claims. This structure is intended to offer defi swaps protection and coverage for typical retail user behavior without overextending the risk pool.

The company stresses that only transactions flagged as safe by MetaMask’s automated systems fall within the protection scope. That said, users still need to review prompts and risk warnings before signing any transaction, as unsafe or manually overridden actions may not qualify.

Exclusions, claims process, and payout structure

Despite its broad reach, Transaction Shield comes with clear exclusions. The service does not cover compromised wallets, broader market losses, or protocol-level exploits, even when they affect assets held in a MetaMask wallet. These carve-outs are meant to prevent the coverage from functioning as open-ended insurance against market volatility or systemic failures.

However, when a covered loss occurs within the approved parameters, subscribers can file a claim within 21 days of the incident. Most reimbursements are processed within 15 business days, according to MetaMask, and are paid out in mUSD at the current market rate at the time of settlement.

Moreover, the policy framework emphasizes documentation and accurate reporting. Users must submit transaction details and on-chain evidence to support their claims, allowing the review team to verify whether the interaction fit into the eligible categories and monthly coverage limits defined by the service.

Shield impact on wallet security and user expectations

The introduction of Metamask shield also signals a broader shift toward monetized security layers in consumer crypto wallets. While self-custody remains central to MetaMask’s model, the company is now offering a paid pathway to mitigate some of the risks associated with complex contract interactions and fast-moving markets.

However, MetaMask continues to warn that no protection product can fully eliminate the dangers of phishing, malicious contracts, or extreme volatility. Users still bear ultimate responsibility for private key management and transaction review, even when using premium tools marketed as transaction loss protection within the wallet stack.

In summary, Transaction Shield adds structured coverage, priority assistance, and clearer expectations around on-chain risk for paying customers, without changing the underlying non-custodial nature of the wallet.

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2025/12/03/metamask-shield-loss-protection/

Market Opportunity
OPT Logo
OPT Price(OPT)
$0.00116
$0.00116$0.00116
-2.52%
USD
OPT (OPT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SM Offices investing P1B in Cebu expansion

SM Offices investing P1B in Cebu expansion

SM OFFICES, the commercial property arm of SM Prime Holdings, Inc., plans to add more than 60,000 square meters (sq.m.) of new leasable space worth about P1 billion
Share
Bworldonline2026/02/20 00:06
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Meme Coin Frenzy Cools, Altcoins Take the Spotlight

Meme Coin Frenzy Cools, Altcoins Take the Spotlight

Pump.fun’s flagship coin PUMP dropped nearly 10% in a single day, dragging down related tokens such as TROLL and Aura, […] The post Meme Coin Frenzy Cools, Altcoins Take the Spotlight appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/20 00:00