Author: Stacy Muur Compiled by: Tim, PANews How to evaluate a project's TGE performance? For each token, I examined it from three aspects: Compared to the all-time high: What percentage has the price retraced from the peak? Time: How long has it been since the all-time high? (Early-stage projects ≠ completely "tested") Liquidity to market capitalization ratio: Is this a true price discovery, or just market noise due to insufficient liquidity? You can think of it this way: If you buy TGE and don't sell at the highest point, how does your profit and loss compare to other tokens of the same caliber? Note: This article represents the author's views only, not those of PANews, and is not investment advice. S-Class: TGE Winner Avici (AVICI) is in a class of its own, S+ Performance: Highest price $5.6, current price $4.3, only a 20-25% drop. For a new coin, this performance is exemplary: the price is strong, the volatility is small, and although the circulating supply is small, the turnover rate is considerable. Analysis: This is a typical "winner's" story. It experienced a surge, but unlike most new coins in 2025, the price did not completely fall back to its starting point. Even now, early investors are still making substantial profits. YieldBasis (YB) Performance: Highs of $0.82–$0.94, current prices of $0.44–$0.56, a drop of 45–55%. The all-time high occurred in mid-October 2025, so it is a recent peak; the current token price is still more than double the lowest point. Analysis: For yield-generating projects launched in a volatile market, it's remarkable that they can maintain half of their all-time high a month after launch. These tokens fall into the category of "strong performance but beginning to revert to the mean." Sahara Labs AI (SAHARA) Performance: The highest price was $0.16, and the current price is $0.008, representing a drop of more than half, but still a 3-4 times increase from the low point. The project received support from well-known venture capital firms (Pantera, Binance Labs, Polychain, etc.) and completed large-scale financing. Its value discovery is not a meme-style pullback. Analysis: In the current market environment, the fact that prices have fallen by half from their peak while still maintaining strong trading volume is truly remarkable. Prices have not collapsed and liquidity remains good. Limitless (LMTS) Performance: Depending on the data source, the highest price ranged from $0.47 to $0.72, while the current price is $0.23, representing a drop of 50% to 65%. TGE is coming very soon (late October 2025), and even after the initial airdrop unlock, the price is currently still in the middle of the range. Analysis: Although it did not reach the level of AVICI, compared to the 70-90% drop in most new coins, LMTS's stability is enough to barely place it in the bottom of the S-level or the top of the A-level. Grade A: TGE showed strong performance after the initial surge, but the subsequent decline was relatively large. Lombard (BARD) Performance: Highest price $1.5-$1.6, current price $0.72-$0.75, a drop of 50-55%, but still 2-3 times higher than the low. Analysis: After a strong initial surge, the price subsequently halved, but it didn't fall into a death spiral. For the Bitcoin ecosystem narrative, which relies heavily on high leverage, this pullback is a tolerable growing pain. Kaito AI(KAITO) Performance: Highest price $2.89, current price $0.8-$0.9, a drop of 70%-75%. The price is still more than 10 times higher than the early low, liquidity is ample, and it is listed on multiple mainstream exchanges. Analysis: This is exactly the TGE case I mentioned as a "successful but already revalued" one: early buyers made a fortune, while later entrants faced selling pressure. However, compared to most AI tokens in 2025, this can still be considered a relative winner. Omnipair (OMFG) Performance: Highest price $1.83-$1.86, current price $0.45, a drop of 75%. However, it should be noted that the price is trending upwards compared to the earlier lows, and the circulating supply is relatively small. Analysis: After an initial strong surge, there was a significant pullback, but the stock was not abandoned by the community. Performance was good, but not top-tier. Umbra (UMBRA) Performance: Highest price $2.47, current price $0.59-$0.60, a drop of 75%. Analysis: Similar to OMFG: it has undergone excessive hype and value reassessment, but still maintains activity and liquidity in the market, which is considered an upper-middle level performance. Avantis (AVNT) Performance: The highest price was $2.64, and the current price is $0.44-$0.45, a drop of 80%-83%, but it is still more than double the lowest point. Derivative DEX tokens, born from extreme speculative frenzy, are now entering a phase of value regression. Analysis: While the drawdown was painful, it remained within the normal fluctuation range for derivatives DEX tokens. The performance was mediocre but not catastrophic. OG Labs (0G) Performance: Highest price $7-7.3, current price $1.2-1.3, a drop of 80%-83%. Analysis: This is a typical high FDV infrastructure project. Its fully diluted valuation was overvalued, leading to a sharp market reassessment. However, it still maintains a considerable market capitalization and trading volume, and has not yet become an empty chain, placing it in the A- to B+ range. Plasma (XPL) Performance: Highest price $1.69, current price $0.25-$0.27, a drop of up to 85%. High trading volume and large market capitalization Analysis: Similar to 0G, it experienced a dramatic revaluation after its strong launch. However, compared to the many seed-label tokens that plummeted by 98% in 2025, it is still considered a "success story". Grade B: TGE surged and then fell back. Linea.eth(LINEA) Performance: Highest price $0.046 - $0.05, current price $0.01, a drop of 75%-80%. As a Layer2 token with a massive airdrop volume, such a pullback is quite normal. Analysis: Similar to 0G, it performed strongly upon launch, but subsequently experienced a significant revaluation. Likewise, compared to many seed-label tokens that plummeted by 98% in 2025, it is still considered a "success story." Story (IP) Performance: Highest price $14.9, current price $2.9-$3, a drop of 80%. Thanks to strong VC backing and an IP narrative, the token still maintains a respectable fully diluted valuation. Analysis: Initially, the stock experienced unprecedented hype, followed by a sustained decline. While it didn't reach a disastrous level, it clearly falls into the category of "surge and fall" type projects. Falcon Finance (FF) Performance: Highest price $0.667, current price $0.14-$0.15, a drop of 75%-80%. Public data shows that its daily trading volume remains enormous, and its TVL (transaction volume limit) is considerable. Analysis: Judging from the trend, TGE was a success (early participants made a profit), but the token price still experienced a 70-80% plunge. Babylon (BABY) Performance: Highest price $0.165-$0.17, current price $0.023-$0.025, a drop of up to 85%. Analysis: As a highly anticipated Bitcoin restaking token, its performance has fallen short of expectations, but it has not yet fallen into the "CORN/NC-style death spiral". Union(U) Performance: Highest price $0.023-$0.027, current price $0.004, a drop of 80%-85%. Analysis: This is a typical price movement for mid-cap governance tokens, characterized by a strong initial launch followed by a slow, gradual decline due to unlocking and inflation. U is not an exception among these tokens. Grade C: Poor performance after TGE Berachain Foundation (BERA) Performance: Highest price $14.5, current price $1.3, a drop of 90%-91%. For Layer 1, which boasts a top-tier narrative, carries huge expectations, and has a high valuation, such performance can be described as a major failure. Analysis: From the perspective of TGE's performance, this is a typical example of excessive VC hype leading to inflated valuations and eventual value reassessment. Boundless (ZKC) Performance: Highest price $1.79, current price $0.15, a drop of 91%. Analysis: Similar to BERA's trajectory but with weaker brand strength; in terms of price, it was clearly a failed TGE. Mira (MIRA) Performance: Highest price $2.35-$2.61, current price $0.18, a drop of 92%-93%. Analysis: Similar to ZKC, after a sharp rise, it experienced a deep decline, and now the chart has become another mid-cap token curve resembling a ski slope. Solv Protocol (SOLV) Performance: Highest price $0.15-$0.25, current price $0.016, a drop of a staggering 90%. Analysis: Given Solv's experience and the scale of its claimed ecosystem, the price trend after TGE was truly disappointing. Allora (ALLO) Performance: Due to different data sources, the highest price was $0.85-$1.70, and the current price is $0.17-$0.18, representing a short-term drop of 80%-90%. Analysis: This is an accelerated version of the airdrop coin model: after the hype dies down, the price plummets by 80-90% instantly. Class D: TGE Disaster If these tokens generate buzz on Twitter, I'll include them in this list of "headline failures." Corn Performance: Highest price $13.98, current price $0.07, a drop of 99.5%. Analysis: This is a normal value correction. Unless you sell quickly near the peak, this TGE will become a graveyard for investors. Nodepay (NC) Performance: Highest price $0.327, current price $0.0035, a drop of 99%. Analysis: This is a typical pattern of a surge followed by a decline, with prices nearly collapsing after a rapid spike. It is a victim of the "airdrop + points mining" craze. Manta Network (MANTA) Performance: Highest price $4.05-$4.08, current price $0.1-$0.11, a drop of 97%. Analysis: For this project, which carried the L2 narrative and was once a star of Binance Launchpool, its current performance is disastrous. Among the well-known projects on this list, Manta is one of the most striking examples of "excessive FDV". A brief review of mid-tier tokens BABY: A drop of 85% from its all-time high is indeed bad, but it's not an isolated case; I put it in B grade because from a market perspective, it still trades like a legitimate Layer 1, restaking project, rather than becoming a dead mining token. XPL, 0G, and AVNT all experienced price pullbacks of 80-85%, but still maintained high trading volumes and market capitalization. Failure to sell at the peak would have resulted in significant losses, but this is almost "normal" in the token issuance environment of 2025. Omnipair, Umbra, BARD, and KAITO: These are TGE cases in the middle tier that are "decently performing" - they experienced a sharp initial surge followed by a significant correction, but still maintained high market liquidity.Author: Stacy Muur Compiled by: Tim, PANews How to evaluate a project's TGE performance? For each token, I examined it from three aspects: Compared to the all-time high: What percentage has the price retraced from the peak? Time: How long has it been since the all-time high? (Early-stage projects ≠ completely "tested") Liquidity to market capitalization ratio: Is this a true price discovery, or just market noise due to insufficient liquidity? You can think of it this way: If you buy TGE and don't sell at the highest point, how does your profit and loss compare to other tokens of the same caliber? Note: This article represents the author's views only, not those of PANews, and is not investment advice. S-Class: TGE Winner Avici (AVICI) is in a class of its own, S+ Performance: Highest price $5.6, current price $4.3, only a 20-25% drop. For a new coin, this performance is exemplary: the price is strong, the volatility is small, and although the circulating supply is small, the turnover rate is considerable. Analysis: This is a typical "winner's" story. It experienced a surge, but unlike most new coins in 2025, the price did not completely fall back to its starting point. Even now, early investors are still making substantial profits. YieldBasis (YB) Performance: Highs of $0.82–$0.94, current prices of $0.44–$0.56, a drop of 45–55%. The all-time high occurred in mid-October 2025, so it is a recent peak; the current token price is still more than double the lowest point. Analysis: For yield-generating projects launched in a volatile market, it's remarkable that they can maintain half of their all-time high a month after launch. These tokens fall into the category of "strong performance but beginning to revert to the mean." Sahara Labs AI (SAHARA) Performance: The highest price was $0.16, and the current price is $0.008, representing a drop of more than half, but still a 3-4 times increase from the low point. The project received support from well-known venture capital firms (Pantera, Binance Labs, Polychain, etc.) and completed large-scale financing. Its value discovery is not a meme-style pullback. Analysis: In the current market environment, the fact that prices have fallen by half from their peak while still maintaining strong trading volume is truly remarkable. Prices have not collapsed and liquidity remains good. Limitless (LMTS) Performance: Depending on the data source, the highest price ranged from $0.47 to $0.72, while the current price is $0.23, representing a drop of 50% to 65%. TGE is coming very soon (late October 2025), and even after the initial airdrop unlock, the price is currently still in the middle of the range. Analysis: Although it did not reach the level of AVICI, compared to the 70-90% drop in most new coins, LMTS's stability is enough to barely place it in the bottom of the S-level or the top of the A-level. Grade A: TGE showed strong performance after the initial surge, but the subsequent decline was relatively large. Lombard (BARD) Performance: Highest price $1.5-$1.6, current price $0.72-$0.75, a drop of 50-55%, but still 2-3 times higher than the low. Analysis: After a strong initial surge, the price subsequently halved, but it didn't fall into a death spiral. For the Bitcoin ecosystem narrative, which relies heavily on high leverage, this pullback is a tolerable growing pain. Kaito AI(KAITO) Performance: Highest price $2.89, current price $0.8-$0.9, a drop of 70%-75%. The price is still more than 10 times higher than the early low, liquidity is ample, and it is listed on multiple mainstream exchanges. Analysis: This is exactly the TGE case I mentioned as a "successful but already revalued" one: early buyers made a fortune, while later entrants faced selling pressure. However, compared to most AI tokens in 2025, this can still be considered a relative winner. Omnipair (OMFG) Performance: Highest price $1.83-$1.86, current price $0.45, a drop of 75%. However, it should be noted that the price is trending upwards compared to the earlier lows, and the circulating supply is relatively small. Analysis: After an initial strong surge, there was a significant pullback, but the stock was not abandoned by the community. Performance was good, but not top-tier. Umbra (UMBRA) Performance: Highest price $2.47, current price $0.59-$0.60, a drop of 75%. Analysis: Similar to OMFG: it has undergone excessive hype and value reassessment, but still maintains activity and liquidity in the market, which is considered an upper-middle level performance. Avantis (AVNT) Performance: The highest price was $2.64, and the current price is $0.44-$0.45, a drop of 80%-83%, but it is still more than double the lowest point. Derivative DEX tokens, born from extreme speculative frenzy, are now entering a phase of value regression. Analysis: While the drawdown was painful, it remained within the normal fluctuation range for derivatives DEX tokens. The performance was mediocre but not catastrophic. OG Labs (0G) Performance: Highest price $7-7.3, current price $1.2-1.3, a drop of 80%-83%. Analysis: This is a typical high FDV infrastructure project. Its fully diluted valuation was overvalued, leading to a sharp market reassessment. However, it still maintains a considerable market capitalization and trading volume, and has not yet become an empty chain, placing it in the A- to B+ range. Plasma (XPL) Performance: Highest price $1.69, current price $0.25-$0.27, a drop of up to 85%. High trading volume and large market capitalization Analysis: Similar to 0G, it experienced a dramatic revaluation after its strong launch. However, compared to the many seed-label tokens that plummeted by 98% in 2025, it is still considered a "success story". Grade B: TGE surged and then fell back. Linea.eth(LINEA) Performance: Highest price $0.046 - $0.05, current price $0.01, a drop of 75%-80%. As a Layer2 token with a massive airdrop volume, such a pullback is quite normal. Analysis: Similar to 0G, it performed strongly upon launch, but subsequently experienced a significant revaluation. Likewise, compared to many seed-label tokens that plummeted by 98% in 2025, it is still considered a "success story." Story (IP) Performance: Highest price $14.9, current price $2.9-$3, a drop of 80%. Thanks to strong VC backing and an IP narrative, the token still maintains a respectable fully diluted valuation. Analysis: Initially, the stock experienced unprecedented hype, followed by a sustained decline. While it didn't reach a disastrous level, it clearly falls into the category of "surge and fall" type projects. Falcon Finance (FF) Performance: Highest price $0.667, current price $0.14-$0.15, a drop of 75%-80%. Public data shows that its daily trading volume remains enormous, and its TVL (transaction volume limit) is considerable. Analysis: Judging from the trend, TGE was a success (early participants made a profit), but the token price still experienced a 70-80% plunge. Babylon (BABY) Performance: Highest price $0.165-$0.17, current price $0.023-$0.025, a drop of up to 85%. Analysis: As a highly anticipated Bitcoin restaking token, its performance has fallen short of expectations, but it has not yet fallen into the "CORN/NC-style death spiral". Union(U) Performance: Highest price $0.023-$0.027, current price $0.004, a drop of 80%-85%. Analysis: This is a typical price movement for mid-cap governance tokens, characterized by a strong initial launch followed by a slow, gradual decline due to unlocking and inflation. U is not an exception among these tokens. Grade C: Poor performance after TGE Berachain Foundation (BERA) Performance: Highest price $14.5, current price $1.3, a drop of 90%-91%. For Layer 1, which boasts a top-tier narrative, carries huge expectations, and has a high valuation, such performance can be described as a major failure. Analysis: From the perspective of TGE's performance, this is a typical example of excessive VC hype leading to inflated valuations and eventual value reassessment. Boundless (ZKC) Performance: Highest price $1.79, current price $0.15, a drop of 91%. Analysis: Similar to BERA's trajectory but with weaker brand strength; in terms of price, it was clearly a failed TGE. Mira (MIRA) Performance: Highest price $2.35-$2.61, current price $0.18, a drop of 92%-93%. Analysis: Similar to ZKC, after a sharp rise, it experienced a deep decline, and now the chart has become another mid-cap token curve resembling a ski slope. Solv Protocol (SOLV) Performance: Highest price $0.15-$0.25, current price $0.016, a drop of a staggering 90%. Analysis: Given Solv's experience and the scale of its claimed ecosystem, the price trend after TGE was truly disappointing. Allora (ALLO) Performance: Due to different data sources, the highest price was $0.85-$1.70, and the current price is $0.17-$0.18, representing a short-term drop of 80%-90%. Analysis: This is an accelerated version of the airdrop coin model: after the hype dies down, the price plummets by 80-90% instantly. Class D: TGE Disaster If these tokens generate buzz on Twitter, I'll include them in this list of "headline failures." Corn Performance: Highest price $13.98, current price $0.07, a drop of 99.5%. Analysis: This is a normal value correction. Unless you sell quickly near the peak, this TGE will become a graveyard for investors. Nodepay (NC) Performance: Highest price $0.327, current price $0.0035, a drop of 99%. Analysis: This is a typical pattern of a surge followed by a decline, with prices nearly collapsing after a rapid spike. It is a victim of the "airdrop + points mining" craze. Manta Network (MANTA) Performance: Highest price $4.05-$4.08, current price $0.1-$0.11, a drop of 97%. Analysis: For this project, which carried the L2 narrative and was once a star of Binance Launchpool, its current performance is disastrous. Among the well-known projects on this list, Manta is one of the most striking examples of "excessive FDV". A brief review of mid-tier tokens BABY: A drop of 85% from its all-time high is indeed bad, but it's not an isolated case; I put it in B grade because from a market perspective, it still trades like a legitimate Layer 1, restaking project, rather than becoming a dead mining token. XPL, 0G, and AVNT all experienced price pullbacks of 80-85%, but still maintained high trading volumes and market capitalization. Failure to sell at the peak would have resulted in significant losses, but this is almost "normal" in the token issuance environment of 2025. Omnipair, Umbra, BARD, and KAITO: These are TGE cases in the middle tier that are "decently performing" - they experienced a sharp initial surge followed by a significant correction, but still maintained high market liquidity.

Who are the "winners"? Who are the "disasters"? TGE performance rating under the atypical bull market of 2025.

2025/11/28 21:00
9 min read

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Tim, PANews

How to evaluate a project's TGE performance?

For each token, I examined it from three aspects:

  1. Compared to the all-time high: What percentage has the price retraced from the peak?
  2. Time: How long has it been since the all-time high? (Early-stage projects ≠ completely "tested")
  3. Liquidity to market capitalization ratio: Is this a true price discovery, or just market noise due to insufficient liquidity?

You can think of it this way: If you buy TGE and don't sell at the highest point, how does your profit and loss compare to other tokens of the same caliber?

Note: This article represents the author's views only, not those of PANews, and is not investment advice.

S-Class: TGE Winner

Avici (AVICI) is in a class of its own, S+

Performance: Highest price $5.6, current price $4.3, only a 20-25% drop.

For a new coin, this performance is exemplary: the price is strong, the volatility is small, and although the circulating supply is small, the turnover rate is considerable.

Analysis: This is a typical "winner's" story. It experienced a surge, but unlike most new coins in 2025, the price did not completely fall back to its starting point. Even now, early investors are still making substantial profits.

YieldBasis (YB)

Performance: Highs of $0.82–$0.94, current prices of $0.44–$0.56, a drop of 45–55%.

The all-time high occurred in mid-October 2025, so it is a recent peak; the current token price is still more than double the lowest point.

Analysis: For yield-generating projects launched in a volatile market, it's remarkable that they can maintain half of their all-time high a month after launch. These tokens fall into the category of "strong performance but beginning to revert to the mean."

Sahara Labs AI (SAHARA)

Performance: The highest price was $0.16, and the current price is $0.008, representing a drop of more than half, but still a 3-4 times increase from the low point.

The project received support from well-known venture capital firms (Pantera, Binance Labs, Polychain, etc.) and completed large-scale financing. Its value discovery is not a meme-style pullback.

Analysis: In the current market environment, the fact that prices have fallen by half from their peak while still maintaining strong trading volume is truly remarkable. Prices have not collapsed and liquidity remains good.

Limitless (LMTS)

Performance: Depending on the data source, the highest price ranged from $0.47 to $0.72, while the current price is $0.23, representing a drop of 50% to 65%.

TGE is coming very soon (late October 2025), and even after the initial airdrop unlock, the price is currently still in the middle of the range.

Analysis: Although it did not reach the level of AVICI, compared to the 70-90% drop in most new coins, LMTS's stability is enough to barely place it in the bottom of the S-level or the top of the A-level.

Grade A: TGE showed strong performance after the initial surge, but the subsequent decline was relatively large.

Lombard (BARD)

Performance: Highest price $1.5-$1.6, current price $0.72-$0.75, a drop of 50-55%, but still 2-3 times higher than the low.

Analysis: After a strong initial surge, the price subsequently halved, but it didn't fall into a death spiral. For the Bitcoin ecosystem narrative, which relies heavily on high leverage, this pullback is a tolerable growing pain.

Kaito AI(KAITO)

Performance: Highest price $2.89, current price $0.8-$0.9, a drop of 70%-75%.

The price is still more than 10 times higher than the early low, liquidity is ample, and it is listed on multiple mainstream exchanges.

Analysis: This is exactly the TGE case I mentioned as a "successful but already revalued" one: early buyers made a fortune, while later entrants faced selling pressure. However, compared to most AI tokens in 2025, this can still be considered a relative winner.

Omnipair (OMFG)

Performance: Highest price $1.83-$1.86, current price $0.45, a drop of 75%.

However, it should be noted that the price is trending upwards compared to the earlier lows, and the circulating supply is relatively small.

Analysis: After an initial strong surge, there was a significant pullback, but the stock was not abandoned by the community. Performance was good, but not top-tier.

Umbra (UMBRA)

Performance: Highest price $2.47, current price $0.59-$0.60, a drop of 75%.

Analysis: Similar to OMFG: it has undergone excessive hype and value reassessment, but still maintains activity and liquidity in the market, which is considered an upper-middle level performance.

Avantis (AVNT)

Performance: The highest price was $2.64, and the current price is $0.44-$0.45, a drop of 80%-83%, but it is still more than double the lowest point.

Derivative DEX tokens, born from extreme speculative frenzy, are now entering a phase of value regression.

Analysis: While the drawdown was painful, it remained within the normal fluctuation range for derivatives DEX tokens. The performance was mediocre but not catastrophic.

OG Labs (0G)

Performance: Highest price $7-7.3, current price $1.2-1.3, a drop of 80%-83%.

Analysis: This is a typical high FDV infrastructure project. Its fully diluted valuation was overvalued, leading to a sharp market reassessment. However, it still maintains a considerable market capitalization and trading volume, and has not yet become an empty chain, placing it in the A- to B+ range.

Plasma (XPL)

Performance: Highest price $1.69, current price $0.25-$0.27, a drop of up to 85%.

High trading volume and large market capitalization

Analysis: Similar to 0G, it experienced a dramatic revaluation after its strong launch. However, compared to the many seed-label tokens that plummeted by 98% in 2025, it is still considered a "success story".

Grade B: TGE surged and then fell back.

Linea.eth(LINEA)

Performance: Highest price $0.046 - $0.05, current price $0.01, a drop of 75%-80%.

As a Layer2 token with a massive airdrop volume, such a pullback is quite normal.

Analysis: Similar to 0G, it performed strongly upon launch, but subsequently experienced a significant revaluation. Likewise, compared to many seed-label tokens that plummeted by 98% in 2025, it is still considered a "success story."

Story (IP)

Performance: Highest price $14.9, current price $2.9-$3, a drop of 80%.

Thanks to strong VC backing and an IP narrative, the token still maintains a respectable fully diluted valuation.

Analysis: Initially, the stock experienced unprecedented hype, followed by a sustained decline. While it didn't reach a disastrous level, it clearly falls into the category of "surge and fall" type projects.

Falcon Finance (FF)

Performance: Highest price $0.667, current price $0.14-$0.15, a drop of 75%-80%.

Public data shows that its daily trading volume remains enormous, and its TVL (transaction volume limit) is considerable.

Analysis: Judging from the trend, TGE was a success (early participants made a profit), but the token price still experienced a 70-80% plunge.

Babylon (BABY)

Performance: Highest price $0.165-$0.17, current price $0.023-$0.025, a drop of up to 85%.

Analysis: As a highly anticipated Bitcoin restaking token, its performance has fallen short of expectations, but it has not yet fallen into the "CORN/NC-style death spiral".

Union(U)

Performance: Highest price $0.023-$0.027, current price $0.004, a drop of 80%-85%.

Analysis: This is a typical price movement for mid-cap governance tokens, characterized by a strong initial launch followed by a slow, gradual decline due to unlocking and inflation. U is not an exception among these tokens.

Grade C: Poor performance after TGE

Berachain Foundation (BERA)

Performance: Highest price $14.5, current price $1.3, a drop of 90%-91%.

For Layer 1, which boasts a top-tier narrative, carries huge expectations, and has a high valuation, such performance can be described as a major failure.

Analysis: From the perspective of TGE's performance, this is a typical example of excessive VC hype leading to inflated valuations and eventual value reassessment.

Boundless (ZKC)

Performance: Highest price $1.79, current price $0.15, a drop of 91%.

Analysis: Similar to BERA's trajectory but with weaker brand strength; in terms of price, it was clearly a failed TGE.

Mira (MIRA)

Performance: Highest price $2.35-$2.61, current price $0.18, a drop of 92%-93%.

Analysis: Similar to ZKC, after a sharp rise, it experienced a deep decline, and now the chart has become another mid-cap token curve resembling a ski slope.

Solv Protocol (SOLV)

Performance: Highest price $0.15-$0.25, current price $0.016, a drop of a staggering 90%.

Analysis: Given Solv's experience and the scale of its claimed ecosystem, the price trend after TGE was truly disappointing.

Allora (ALLO)

Performance: Due to different data sources, the highest price was $0.85-$1.70, and the current price is $0.17-$0.18, representing a short-term drop of 80%-90%.

Analysis: This is an accelerated version of the airdrop coin model: after the hype dies down, the price plummets by 80-90% instantly.

Class D: TGE Disaster

If these tokens generate buzz on Twitter, I'll include them in this list of "headline failures."

Corn

Performance: Highest price $13.98, current price $0.07, a drop of 99.5%.

Analysis: This is a normal value correction. Unless you sell quickly near the peak, this TGE will become a graveyard for investors.

Nodepay (NC)

Performance: Highest price $0.327, current price $0.0035, a drop of 99%.

Analysis: This is a typical pattern of a surge followed by a decline, with prices nearly collapsing after a rapid spike. It is a victim of the "airdrop + points mining" craze.

Manta Network (MANTA)

Performance: Highest price $4.05-$4.08, current price $0.1-$0.11, a drop of 97%.

Analysis: For this project, which carried the L2 narrative and was once a star of Binance Launchpool, its current performance is disastrous. Among the well-known projects on this list, Manta is one of the most striking examples of "excessive FDV".

A brief review of mid-tier tokens

BABY: A drop of 85% from its all-time high is indeed bad, but it's not an isolated case; I put it in B grade because from a market perspective, it still trades like a legitimate Layer 1, restaking project, rather than becoming a dead mining token.

XPL, 0G, and AVNT all experienced price pullbacks of 80-85%, but still maintained high trading volumes and market capitalization. Failure to sell at the peak would have resulted in significant losses, but this is almost "normal" in the token issuance environment of 2025.

Omnipair, Umbra, BARD, and KAITO: These are TGE cases in the middle tier that are "decently performing" - they experienced a sharp initial surge followed by a significant correction, but still maintained high market liquidity.

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.003685
$0.003685$0.003685
-0.64%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15