The post Abstraction layers are the upgrade DeFi needs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Decentralized finance, or DeFi, has both a financially expensive and time-costly bug, but it doesn’t exist in the code. It resides in market structure, the marooned liquidity that lingers across L1s, L2s, appchains, and bridges. Each is attributed with its own fee market, user experience, and MEV profile.  Summary Fragmentation drains efficiency: Liquidity scattered across L1s, L2s, and bridges imposes slippage, idle capital, and operational risk — acting as a hidden tax on DeFi. Abstraction is the solution: Smart accounts and intent-based routing can unify liquidity, automate execution, and deliver a single portfolio view — eliminating the need for manual cross-chain management. Verifiability builds trust: Institutional adoption depends on transparent, auditable execution layers that prove route choices and outcomes, turning abstraction into both an efficiency gain and a compliance advantage. Every hop imposes slippage, operational risk, and idle buffers, and capital that should be compounding instead sits in transit as users get forced to play air-traffic controller across wallets, custodians, and bridges. Sorry to break the illusion here, but the fix won’t come from another bridge. Where it will come from is abstraction, smart account rails, and intent routers that make the chain gently fade into the background.  In a mature design, a trader expresses what should happen, such as a hedge or rebalance, and the execution layer determines where and how across networks. This guarantees the best execution route possible and keeps settlement assurance neatly tucked away under the hood so the UX remains flawlessly smooth. This abstraction layer is the answer to DeFi’s liquidity problem, and DeFi will only truly earn institutional flow once users hold one portfolio view and one source of truth, while… The post Abstraction layers are the upgrade DeFi needs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Decentralized finance, or DeFi, has both a financially expensive and time-costly bug, but it doesn’t exist in the code. It resides in market structure, the marooned liquidity that lingers across L1s, L2s, appchains, and bridges. Each is attributed with its own fee market, user experience, and MEV profile.  Summary Fragmentation drains efficiency: Liquidity scattered across L1s, L2s, and bridges imposes slippage, idle capital, and operational risk — acting as a hidden tax on DeFi. Abstraction is the solution: Smart accounts and intent-based routing can unify liquidity, automate execution, and deliver a single portfolio view — eliminating the need for manual cross-chain management. Verifiability builds trust: Institutional adoption depends on transparent, auditable execution layers that prove route choices and outcomes, turning abstraction into both an efficiency gain and a compliance advantage. Every hop imposes slippage, operational risk, and idle buffers, and capital that should be compounding instead sits in transit as users get forced to play air-traffic controller across wallets, custodians, and bridges. Sorry to break the illusion here, but the fix won’t come from another bridge. Where it will come from is abstraction, smart account rails, and intent routers that make the chain gently fade into the background.  In a mature design, a trader expresses what should happen, such as a hedge or rebalance, and the execution layer determines where and how across networks. This guarantees the best execution route possible and keeps settlement assurance neatly tucked away under the hood so the UX remains flawlessly smooth. This abstraction layer is the answer to DeFi’s liquidity problem, and DeFi will only truly earn institutional flow once users hold one portfolio view and one source of truth, while…

Abstraction layers are the upgrade DeFi needs

5 min read

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Decentralized finance, or DeFi, has both a financially expensive and time-costly bug, but it doesn’t exist in the code. It resides in market structure, the marooned liquidity that lingers across L1s, L2s, appchains, and bridges. Each is attributed with its own fee market, user experience, and MEV profile. 

Summary

  • Fragmentation drains efficiency: Liquidity scattered across L1s, L2s, and bridges imposes slippage, idle capital, and operational risk — acting as a hidden tax on DeFi.
  • Abstraction is the solution: Smart accounts and intent-based routing can unify liquidity, automate execution, and deliver a single portfolio view — eliminating the need for manual cross-chain management.
  • Verifiability builds trust: Institutional adoption depends on transparent, auditable execution layers that prove route choices and outcomes, turning abstraction into both an efficiency gain and a compliance advantage.

Every hop imposes slippage, operational risk, and idle buffers, and capital that should be compounding instead sits in transit as users get forced to play air-traffic controller across wallets, custodians, and bridges. Sorry to break the illusion here, but the fix won’t come from another bridge. Where it will come from is abstraction, smart account rails, and intent routers that make the chain gently fade into the background. 

In a mature design, a trader expresses what should happen, such as a hedge or rebalance, and the execution layer determines where and how across networks. This guarantees the best execution route possible and keeps settlement assurance neatly tucked away under the hood so the UX remains flawlessly smooth.

This abstraction layer is the answer to DeFi’s liquidity problem, and DeFi will only truly earn institutional flow once users hold one portfolio view and one source of truth, while intents route to the best venue, automatically. 

Need proof? The BIS Annual Economic Report 2025 argues that tokenized platforms can concentrate liquidity, reduce settlement frictions, and support new market designs. Long story short, the direction of travel is unmistakable and the facts undeniable: fragmentation now matters systemically.

Fragmentation is a hidden tax

Splitting liquidity across chains forces protocols to warehouse excess collateral to guard against common issues like oracle desyncs, bridge delays, and general cross-domain failures. 

Traders end up overpaying through slippage and spreads since pools are shallower on each side. The result becomes a negative carry on the whole stack, with more operational overhead, more approvals, and more idle float. This is fragmented execution in practice, and shows exactly why a change is needed.

Abstraction layers that unify, balance, and prove the best execution will collapse the endless taxing fragmentation plaguing DeFi and finally unlock capital efficiency throughout. Through an intent-based layer, users state a desired end state while an off- or on-chain solver orchestrates routes across venues and networks under enforceable constraints. 

Smart accounts (via account abstraction) provide the policy controls in this case, so that complex cross-chain flows can execute without click fatigue. If everything is done right, liquidity no longer lingers where the user left it but where the trade needs it. The means optimizes the ends, not merely justifies them.

Verifiable execution and nothing less

Abstraction that loses its transparency and opts for traditional opaque practices will fail policy and procurement tests. Institutional capital does not (and will never) accept the ‘trust me bro’ method of routing since it demands verifiable execution, one that comes tied to auditable data.

Verifiable execution enables the creation of an environment where users can either constrain exposure to MEV and latency arbitrage or they can pay for protection. Pair this with cryptographic receipts available for decisions made when routing, and the system becomes public, replayable, and provable. 

The European Central Bank’s Financial Stability Review of May focused on crypto-TradFi interconnectivity, implying a future where interoperability is judged on the reliability of its controls. Abstraction layers that can prove route choice, price improvement, and settlement finality will clear the need for due diligence, those that cannot be ring-fenced. 

Since fragmentation is a tax, abstraction is effectively the rebate because it removes the bridge roulette and tab-hopping elements of the UX from the process. 

Those that shift toward abstraction layer building first and intent-based routing will be the ones to succeed in the future of regulatory minefields and UX supremacy. The only thing that fundamentally matters in any market is user trust, and when liquidity without chains or friction becomes possible, capital efficiency becomes inevitable.

Sky

Sky is the founder of LIKWID, a DeFi protocol unifying DEX and lending on Uniswap V4. A seasoned fintech CTO turned crypto-native entrepreneur, Sky has built across the blockchain stack since 2018, from OTC trading desks and EOS-based games to DeFi protocols and mining infrastructure. His current focus is building the foundation for a new generation of permissionless, oracle-free financial applications.

Source: https://crypto.news/abstraction-layers-are-the-upgrade-defi-needs-opinion/

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000352
$0.000352$0.000352
+2.92%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55