Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs). New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection. The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on [...]]]>Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs). New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection. The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on [...]]]>

Brazil’s Central Bank Greenlights Full Crypto Framework: Here’s the 2026 VASP Launch Date

2025/11/11 10:00
  • Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
  • New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection.

The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on June 2, 2026, detail the conditions for operating in the sector and assign a specific classification to stablecoins, integrating their use into the framework for international exchange.

Resolutions BCB nº 519, 520, and 521 form the foundation of the new supervisory scheme. Resolution nº 519 defines the figure of the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) and establishes operational requirements.

These institutions, whether traditional financial entities or companies created exclusively for this purpose, must comply with rules for governance, internal control, and procedures against money laundering and terrorist financing. Their operation as intermediaries, custodians, or brokers requires a guarantee of transparency and client protection.

The authorization process for these providers is detailed in Resolution nº 520. This norm updates the criteria applicable to financial segments and sets deadlines for existing companies in the sector to adapt to the Central Bank’s requirements.

The Direct Impact on Stablecoins and International Transactions

Resolution nº 521 creates a substantial change by classifying operations with virtual assets as part of the foreign exchange and international capital markets. Activities such as international payments, transfers to self-custodied wallets, and conversions between fiat currencies and crypto assets fall under this category. In practice, transactions with stablecoins like USDT, USDC, BRZ, and BRLV are equated to traditional foreign exchange operations.

This measure means that international payments or remittances made with stablecoins are subject to the same limits and identification requirements. The rule sets an operational cap of 100,000 dollars per transaction when the counterparty is not a registered financial institution. Companies must implement processes to verify the origin and destination of funds, in addition to reporting data to the Central Bank.

A BCB executive, Gilneu, specified that stablecoins with algorithmic collateral control will not be accepted, citing previous cases where these assets did not prove functional.

The publication of these resolutions represents the final stage of a process that began with Law nº 14,478/2022 and continued with Decree nº 11,563/2023, which designated the Central Bank as the sector’s authority. The public consultations numbered 97/2023, 109/2024, 110/2024, and 111/2024 have now resulted in regulation with concrete deadlines and obligations.

]]>
Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03722
$0.03722$0.03722
+0.10%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41