I’ve always wanted to add an interesting spin-off to this Crypto “Three Kingdoms” article: 1) The Crypto Native Narrative School corresponds to the isolated "Shu Kingdom", which is located in the dangerous Bashu area. Vitalik Buterin is the "Zhuge Liang, drawing the Rollup Centric" and "ZK Endgame" as the roadmap of the grand blueprint. Advocating the concepts of governing the country with virtue, such as "Code is Law" and "decentralization", is very similar to Liu Bei's benevolence and righteousness. It seems to be on the moral high ground, but it is restricted everywhere in the cruel market competition. What about joining forces with Wu to fight against Cao, and conquering the Central Plains in the north? New technology narratives have been introduced time and time again, from DeFi to NFT to layer2 and AI Agent. Just like Ge Liang's six expeditions to Qishan, each one was a grand event, but the application of Mass Adoption was always one step away. Until Zhuge Liang died after devoting himself to his work, developers fled the AI community, leaving behind a dwindling pool of talent and a lack of successors. While I hate to say that idealism was the first to fall, the good news is that the belief in "Han and traitors cannot coexist" and the spirit of decentralization will continue to be the industry's guiding principles. 2) The CEX Exchange Alliance corresponds to the "Wei State" that occupies the Central Plains, with CZ as "Cao Cao", who holds "user liquidity" and "currency listing rights" to hold the emperor hostage and control the princes. They vigorously pursued a "military farming" strategy, establishing a new ICO pipeline consisting of Wallet, Alpha, and contracts, encircling all parties within their own internal market. Fortunately, they prioritized talent, recruiting both technical and MEME-focused investors as long as they could generate trading volume. Consequently, China's national strength reached its peak, crushing all competitors. However, the biggest risk of this approach is fostering too many "parasites"—market makers, project owners, and KOLs—all sucking away revenue. Once problems arise, the entire system collapses instantly. This ultimately created a bustling and prosperous era, but after a wave of vigorous "regulatory arbitrage," it ultimately became a mirage. Ultimately, they will either be "recruited" by regulators, "shorn of power" by internal interest groups, or "usurped" by new forces. This constant spree of "quick money projects" and overdrawing the industry's long-term credit is bound to backfire. It's unclear whether the CEX empire will ultimately be named "Zhao" or "Trump." 3) Wall Street financial capital represents the "Eastern Wu" that controls Jiangdong, with Wall Street institutions like Coinbase and BlackRock and US political figures representing "Sun Quan." They collaborate with the tech-savvy Shu Kingdom to promote decentralized innovation, while collaborating with the Wei Kingdom to develop compliant CEX channels. They partner with whoever is useful, employing a strategic strategy of "uniting with secondary enemies to attack the primary one," carefully strategizing and assessing the situation. Just like the Eastern Wu dynasty, which controlled the Yangtze River, Wall Street has seized the advantage of "dollar hegemony" and its "compliance moat." They control off-chain access with ETFs, on-chain settlement with USDT and USDC, and are infiltrating the DeFi ecosystem with RWA strategies like tokenizing US stocks and on-chain US Treasury bonds. The smartest strategy now is to bide one's time, letting the tech-savvy CEXs fight a decisive battle while they quietly plan and profit. There's no doubt that if the future trend of crypto is toward compliance, institutionalization, and licensing, then the crypto world will ultimately belong to Wall Street. Now you understand why they say the old Northern Wei dynasty might soon be ruled by the Eastern Wu "Trump." The difference is that Trump is not Sima Yi, and he doesn't need to lie low and be sneaky.I’ve always wanted to add an interesting spin-off to this Crypto “Three Kingdoms” article: 1) The Crypto Native Narrative School corresponds to the isolated "Shu Kingdom", which is located in the dangerous Bashu area. Vitalik Buterin is the "Zhuge Liang, drawing the Rollup Centric" and "ZK Endgame" as the roadmap of the grand blueprint. Advocating the concepts of governing the country with virtue, such as "Code is Law" and "decentralization", is very similar to Liu Bei's benevolence and righteousness. It seems to be on the moral high ground, but it is restricted everywhere in the cruel market competition. What about joining forces with Wu to fight against Cao, and conquering the Central Plains in the north? New technology narratives have been introduced time and time again, from DeFi to NFT to layer2 and AI Agent. Just like Ge Liang's six expeditions to Qishan, each one was a grand event, but the application of Mass Adoption was always one step away. Until Zhuge Liang died after devoting himself to his work, developers fled the AI community, leaving behind a dwindling pool of talent and a lack of successors. While I hate to say that idealism was the first to fall, the good news is that the belief in "Han and traitors cannot coexist" and the spirit of decentralization will continue to be the industry's guiding principles. 2) The CEX Exchange Alliance corresponds to the "Wei State" that occupies the Central Plains, with CZ as "Cao Cao", who holds "user liquidity" and "currency listing rights" to hold the emperor hostage and control the princes. They vigorously pursued a "military farming" strategy, establishing a new ICO pipeline consisting of Wallet, Alpha, and contracts, encircling all parties within their own internal market. Fortunately, they prioritized talent, recruiting both technical and MEME-focused investors as long as they could generate trading volume. Consequently, China's national strength reached its peak, crushing all competitors. However, the biggest risk of this approach is fostering too many "parasites"—market makers, project owners, and KOLs—all sucking away revenue. Once problems arise, the entire system collapses instantly. This ultimately created a bustling and prosperous era, but after a wave of vigorous "regulatory arbitrage," it ultimately became a mirage. Ultimately, they will either be "recruited" by regulators, "shorn of power" by internal interest groups, or "usurped" by new forces. This constant spree of "quick money projects" and overdrawing the industry's long-term credit is bound to backfire. It's unclear whether the CEX empire will ultimately be named "Zhao" or "Trump." 3) Wall Street financial capital represents the "Eastern Wu" that controls Jiangdong, with Wall Street institutions like Coinbase and BlackRock and US political figures representing "Sun Quan." They collaborate with the tech-savvy Shu Kingdom to promote decentralized innovation, while collaborating with the Wei Kingdom to develop compliant CEX channels. They partner with whoever is useful, employing a strategic strategy of "uniting with secondary enemies to attack the primary one," carefully strategizing and assessing the situation. Just like the Eastern Wu dynasty, which controlled the Yangtze River, Wall Street has seized the advantage of "dollar hegemony" and its "compliance moat." They control off-chain access with ETFs, on-chain settlement with USDT and USDC, and are infiltrating the DeFi ecosystem with RWA strategies like tokenizing US stocks and on-chain US Treasury bonds. The smartest strategy now is to bide one's time, letting the tech-savvy CEXs fight a decisive battle while they quietly plan and profit. There's no doubt that if the future trend of crypto is toward compliance, institutionalization, and licensing, then the crypto world will ultimately belong to Wall Street. Now you understand why they say the old Northern Wei dynasty might soon be ruled by the Eastern Wu "Trump." The difference is that Trump is not Sima Yi, and he doesn't need to lie low and be sneaky.

Crypto Three Kingdoms Extra: When Wall Street's compliance fleet enters the DeFi Yangtze River

2025/10/17 13:00
4 min read

I’ve always wanted to add an interesting spin-off to this Crypto “Three Kingdoms” article:

1) The Crypto Native Narrative School corresponds to the isolated "Shu Kingdom", which is located in the dangerous Bashu area. Vitalik Buterin is the "Zhuge Liang, drawing the Rollup Centric" and "ZK Endgame" as the roadmap of the grand blueprint.

Advocating the concepts of governing the country with virtue, such as "Code is Law" and "decentralization", is very similar to Liu Bei's benevolence and righteousness. It seems to be on the moral high ground, but it is restricted everywhere in the cruel market competition.

What about joining forces with Wu to fight against Cao, and conquering the Central Plains in the north? New technology narratives have been introduced time and time again, from DeFi to NFT to layer2 and AI Agent. Just like Ge Liang's six expeditions to Qishan, each one was a grand event, but the application of Mass Adoption was always one step away.

Until Zhuge Liang died after devoting himself to his work, developers fled the AI community, leaving behind a dwindling pool of talent and a lack of successors. While I hate to say that idealism was the first to fall, the good news is that the belief in "Han and traitors cannot coexist" and the spirit of decentralization will continue to be the industry's guiding principles.

2) The CEX Exchange Alliance corresponds to the "Wei State" that occupies the Central Plains, with CZ as "Cao Cao", who holds "user liquidity" and "currency listing rights" to hold the emperor hostage and control the princes.

They vigorously pursued a "military farming" strategy, establishing a new ICO pipeline consisting of Wallet, Alpha, and contracts, encircling all parties within their own internal market. Fortunately, they prioritized talent, recruiting both technical and MEME-focused investors as long as they could generate trading volume. Consequently, China's national strength reached its peak, crushing all competitors.

However, the biggest risk of this approach is fostering too many "parasites"—market makers, project owners, and KOLs—all sucking away revenue. Once problems arise, the entire system collapses instantly. This ultimately created a bustling and prosperous era, but after a wave of vigorous "regulatory arbitrage," it ultimately became a mirage.

Ultimately, they will either be "recruited" by regulators, "shorn of power" by internal interest groups, or "usurped" by new forces. This constant spree of "quick money projects" and overdrawing the industry's long-term credit is bound to backfire. It's unclear whether the CEX empire will ultimately be named "Zhao" or "Trump."

3) Wall Street financial capital represents the "Eastern Wu" that controls Jiangdong, with Wall Street institutions like Coinbase and BlackRock and US political figures representing "Sun Quan." They collaborate with the tech-savvy Shu Kingdom to promote decentralized innovation, while collaborating with the Wei Kingdom to develop compliant CEX channels. They partner with whoever is useful, employing a strategic strategy of "uniting with secondary enemies to attack the primary one," carefully strategizing and assessing the situation.

Just like the Eastern Wu dynasty, which controlled the Yangtze River, Wall Street has seized the advantage of "dollar hegemony" and its "compliance moat." They control off-chain access with ETFs, on-chain settlement with USDT and USDC, and are infiltrating the DeFi ecosystem with RWA strategies like tokenizing US stocks and on-chain US Treasury bonds. The smartest strategy now is to bide one's time, letting the tech-savvy CEXs fight a decisive battle while they quietly plan and profit.

There's no doubt that if the future trend of crypto is toward compliance, institutionalization, and licensing, then the crypto world will ultimately belong to Wall Street. Now you understand why they say the old Northern Wei dynasty might soon be ruled by the Eastern Wu "Trump."

The difference is that Trump is not Sima Yi, and he doesn't need to lie low and be sneaky.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.00034
$0.00034$0.00034
-3.68%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cathie Wood's Ark Bets Big On Solana Treasury Play: Makes $162M Investment In Brera Holdings As Stock Explodes 225%

Cathie Wood's Ark Bets Big On Solana Treasury Play: Makes $162M Investment In Brera Holdings As Stock Explodes 225%

On Thursday, Cathie Wood-led Ark Invest executed significant trades, notably selling shares of Tempus AI Inc (NASDAQ:TEM) and buying shares of Brera Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:BREA), read more
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 09:42
A Reality Check Pi Holders Might Not Want to Hear

A Reality Check Pi Holders Might Not Want to Hear

The post A Reality Check Pi Holders Might Not Want to Hear appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 23 September 2025 | 17:10 Recent Pi Network price predictions are disheartening. Once praised as a mobile-driven crypto revolution, Pi Network has left many holders with significant losses, with prices still over 65% below their peak. Growing doubts about its viability stem from its limited utility. As uncertainty about Pi Network’s future increases, traders are turning their attention to presale opportunities with actual potential, such as Layer Brett ($LBRETT), which is gaining momentum. Pi Network Price Predictions Point to a Possible Setback The Pi Network price prediction has been a topic of intense discussion among crypto enthusiasts. Recent analyses suggest that the token is poised for a correction, challenging the optimistic outlooks held by many holders. Experts say that by October 22, 2025, Pi Network’s price will drop by about 25%, to $0.259345. Another negative Pi Network price prediction suggests the price will drop to $0.2597 in 2025 and then slowly rise to $0.4939 in 2026. Based on these predictions, investors would have to deal with a time of no growth and possibly losses. Source: CoinMarketcap Some long-term estimates are still positive, saying that prices might reach $2.09 by 2030, but the near future is not certain. Pi Network’s growth potential is still limited by the fact that it hasn’t been widely adopted or used in the real world. Investors should be careful because recent Pi Network price predictions show there is a chance that prices will drop again soon. How Layer Brett Breaks the Mold Layer Brett stands out for several key reasons. Currently in presale at just $0.0058, having already raised over $3.9 million, it offers far more than Pi Network ever did. Staking is live, boasting an impressive 660%+ APY, though this yield decreases as more wallets join, creating an inherent sense of urgency. Unlike…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/23 23:51
MOEX to Launch $XRP Indices/Futures: $MAXI Adoption Grows

MOEX to Launch $XRP Indices/Futures: $MAXI Adoption Grows

The post MOEX to Launch $XRP Indices/Futures: $MAXI Adoption Grows appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MOEX to Launch $XRP Indices/Futures: $MAXI Adoption
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/04 06:00