President Donald Trump appears blind to consumers’ rocketing electricity costs, reports the Washington Post. If anything, the president appears willing to make President Donald Trump appears blind to consumers’ rocketing electricity costs, reports the Washington Post. If anything, the president appears willing to make

Americans on the hook for an extra $6 billion — thanks to Trump: report

President Donald Trump appears blind to consumers’ rocketing electricity costs, reports the Washington Post. If anything, the president appears willing to make consumers pay even more for their monthly power bills to protect his favored industry.

“On energy policy, the administration’s most obvious sin has been picking losers,” reports the Post. “It has attempted to halt construction for offshore wind developments, even some that were nearly complete, and suffocated massive solar projects with red tape. As the nation clamors for more electricity, this oppositional attitude makes no policy sense.”

But it is Trump’s militant embrace of the wildly outdated and expensive coal industry that has energy strategists perplexed, and consumers furious.

“The Energy Department quietly issued emergency orders in late December requiring four coal plants to keep operating that had been scheduled to retire. That was in addition to another plant in Michigan that the administration has forced to remain open since last May. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has indicated he intends to do the same for additional plants,” the Post reports.

But Trump appears to be protecting coal plants not from coal-hating liberalsbut from economics. The power industry itself has opened no new coal plants in recent history for a reason. Other forms of energy, including natural gas, are cheaper, while solar has fewer moving parts, less pollution and no capacity to poison neighbors with mercury and toxins. Coal plants are also woefully inefficient — wasting roughly two-thirds of their energy through heat, according to the Post, and they take hours for their dated technology (which is barely a step up from that of a campfire) to ramp up.

Plus, the aging facilities that were scheduled for retirement are in “disrepair and require expensive investments to keep operating safely,” according to the Posy. One facility in Michigan — which Trump is determined to drive like a zombie — has already been offline for long stretches for maintenance.

“The plant’s operator, Consumers Energy, told regulators in November that running past its scheduled retirement had cost $80 million since May, more than $615,000 per day. And who picks up that tab? Residents, in the form of higher electricity bills,” the Post reports. “Ratepayers nationally will take on as much as $6 billion in higher costs by 2028 if this pattern continues, according to analysis last year by the consulting firm Grid Strategies.”

Another plant Trump forced to stay open in the state of Washington had long been slated for closure, even going so far as to pay employees a $50,000 “parting bonus” to help with their re-education into new jobs.

“This is what it looks like when ideology drives energy policy,” said the Post. “Keeping money-losing plants online skews the market, making it harder for companies to invest in the infrastructure of the future.”

Meanwhile, energy bills across the US have increased by 13 percent since Trump returned to the White House last January.

Read the Washington Post report at this link.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Witness Bitcoin’s Dramatic Plunge in A Volatile Crypto Market

Witness Bitcoin’s Dramatic Plunge in A Volatile Crypto Market

The new Fed chairman and geopolitical risks affect cryptocurrency outlook. Bitcoin fails to maintain key levels, hitting lowest since October 2023. Continue
Share
Coinstats2026/02/01 03:04
Smart Money Accumulates SUI as Weekly Chart Signals Expansion Phase Ahead

Smart Money Accumulates SUI as Weekly Chart Signals Expansion Phase Ahead

TLDR: SUI preserves its long-term ascending channel, signaling macro strength despite deep corrective phases  Sell-side liquidity sweeps near trendline support
Share
Blockonomi2026/02/01 03:25