UNIfication turns UNI from a passive governance token into a burn‑driven proxy on Uniswap’s swap and L2 revenue. The post Uniswap Approves 100M UNI Burn, ActivatesUNIfication turns UNI from a passive governance token into a burn‑driven proxy on Uniswap’s swap and L2 revenue. The post Uniswap Approves 100M UNI Burn, Activates

Uniswap Approves 100M UNI Burn, Activates Fee Switch

Uniswap governance approved the UNIfication overhaul on December 25, locking in a 100-million-UNI treasury burn. The vote also activated protocol fees that will fund ongoing UNI $5.95 24h volatility: 2.8% Market cap: $3.75 B Vol. 24h: $369.66 M destruction, according to the finalized proposal on the Uniswap forum and Labs blog.

Uniswap Vote Details

The on‑chain vote closed with 125,342,017 UNI in favor, and 742 against. Uniswap founder Hayden Adams posted on X, clearing the 40 million UNI quorum by more than 3x.

After the mandatory ~2‑day timelock, the contracts execute, and the burn transactions and fee parameters go live. Governance records on the Uniswap portal show turnout of more than 20% of outstanding UNI, one of the highest participation rates in the protocol’s history, with more than 99.9% of cast votes backing the change.

UNI traded around $6.05, +2.3% in 24h at 17:00 UTC on December 26, holding gains from a run that started when the vote opened.

Uniswap price on Dec. 26 | Source: CoinMarketCap

Uniswap price on Dec. 26 | Source: CoinMarketCap

What Changes After the Uniswap Vote

The primary spec, published as the UNIfication proposal on the Uniswap governance forum and mirrored in the Uniswap Labs blog, lays out eight concrete actions.

The protocol will transfer 100 million UNI from the treasury to a burn address. It will remove roughly 16% of total supply from circulation, and flip the long‑dormant fee switch on Uniswap v2 and a curated set of high‑volume v3 pools on Ethereum mainnet. For v2, LP fees move from 0.30% to 0.25%, with 0.05% of volume now accruing to the protocol. For v3, the proposal sets protocol fees at 25% of LP fees on the 0.01% and 0.05% tiers and at 16.7% of LP fees on the 0.30% and 1% tiers, with governance able to adjust pool-by-pool in follow‑up votes.

All protocol fees, plus net sequencer revenue from Unichain after L1 data costs and the 15% Optimism share, now route into a programmatic burn mechanism described in the proposal and supporting documentation. The design uses two contracts, commonly referred to in community analysis as TokenJar and Firepit.

Uniswap burn mechanism | Source: gov.uniswap.org

Uniswap burn mechanism | Source: gov.uniswap.org

Fees will accumulate there until UNI is destroyed. At that point, the contract will release claims, turning protocol usage directly into supply reduction.

In addition, Labs committed in the proposal to turn off all frontend, wallet, and API fees, removing application‑layer monetization from its products. In exchange, governance approved a 40-million-UNI treasury allocation on a two‑year vesting schedule as a recurring growth and development budget. That allocation is separate from the 100 million UNI burn and will fund Labs’ protocol‑focused roadmap, including Uniswap v4 “hooks,” Protocol Fee Discount Auctions, and aggregator functionality.

Uniswap to Burn Up to $700M of UNI Annually

Uniswap Labs’ blog notes that Unichain currently runs at roughly $100 billion in annualized DEX volume and around $7.5 million in annualized sequencer fees. It will now join swap fees as inputs to the burn engine.

Third‑party modeling from research pieces by Tekedia and OKX estimates that the combined system can erase $280 million to $700 million worth of UNI annually if 2025 fee levels persist.

next

The post Uniswap Approves 100M UNI Burn, Activates Fee Switch appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Market Opportunity
UNISWAP Logo
UNISWAP Price(UNI)
$5.896
$5.896$5.896
-0.16%
USD
UNISWAP (UNI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48