The proposed COC is meant to set rules to prevent incidents and reduce tensions in the South China Sea, where ASEAN member states and China assert overlapping claimsThe proposed COC is meant to set rules to prevent incidents and reduce tensions in the South China Sea, where ASEAN member states and China assert overlapping claims

What you should know about ASEAN-China talks on Code of Conduct in South China Sea

2026/01/30 08:00

MANILA, Philippines – Talks between ASEAN and China on a Code of Conduct (COC) in the South China Sea have stretched for more than two decades, underscoring both the complexity of territorial and maritime disputes and the urgent need to create guidelines for managing maritime disputes and preventing armed conflicts.

The proposed COC is meant to set rules to prevent incidents and reduce tensions in the South China Sea, where several ASEAN member states and China assert overlapping claims.

How the negotiations progressed 

The push for a Code of Conduct began in the mid-1990s, following continued tensions in the South China Sea.

In 1988, China and Vietnam fought in Johnson South Reef in the Spratly Island Group, where over 60 Vietnamese sailors were killed. In 1995, China occupied Philippine-claimed Mischief Reef and the following year, Chinese naval vessels fought an hour and a half long battle with Philippine navy gunboats.

ASEAN wanted a regional framework that would encourage restraint and keep disputes from turning into armed conflict. That effort led to the signing of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) in November 2002. The agreement was not legally binding, but it mattered because ASEAN and China formally agreed to work toward a more detailed and effective Code of Conduct.

The progress after 2002 was notably slow. Consultations continued, but talks were often stalled by regional tensions, differing national interests, and disagreements over how binding the COC should be.

A breakthrough came in 2018, when ASEAN and China agreed on a Single Draft Negotiating Text, bringing together proposals from all parties. The first reading of the draft was completed in 2019, and the second reading followed in 2023. While these rounds of talk helped clarify positions, major issues were left unresolved. 

In July 2023, ASEAN and China adopted guidelines to speed up negotiations and set a goal to finalize the COC within three years, or by July 2026

In 2025, talks had entered the third reading, with negotiators finally tackling so-called “milestone issues,” including whether the COC will be legally binding, its geographic scope, how it will relate to the existing DOC, and how terms would be defined in the code. 

What’s at stake

The Code of Conduct is still unfinished, even as tensions in the West Philippine Sea continue to rise. Encounters between Philippine and Chinese vessels are happening more frequently, making the disputes more visible and worrying some especially for fisherfolks working in the disputed area.

For countries like the Philippines, the outcome of the negotiations could determine whether there are clearer rules, fewer risky and violent encounters, and greater respect for international law, including UNCLOS. Without a meaningful and mutually beneficial agreement, the gap between talks at the table and tensions at sea could widen even more, putting more lives and livelihoods at risk. – Arianne dela Cruz/Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Republic Europe Offers Indirect Kraken Stake via SPV

Republic Europe Offers Indirect Kraken Stake via SPV

Republic Europe launches SPV for European retail access to Kraken equity pre-IPO.
Share
bitcoininfonews2026/01/30 13:32
cpwrt Limited Positions Customer Support as a Strategic Growth Function

cpwrt Limited Positions Customer Support as a Strategic Growth Function

For many growing businesses, customer support is often viewed as a cost center rather than a strategic function. cpwrt limited challenges this perception by providing
Share
Techbullion2026/01/30 13:07
How is the xStocks tokenized stock market developing?

How is the xStocks tokenized stock market developing?

Author: Heechang Compiled by: TechFlow xStocks offers a tokenized stock service, allowing investors to trade tokenized versions of popular US stocks like Tesla in real time. While still in its early stages, it’s already showing some interesting signs of growth. Observation 1: Trading is concentrated in Tesla (TSLA) As in many emerging markets, trading activity has quickly concentrated on a handful of stocks. Data shows a high concentration of trading volume in the most well-known and volatile stocks, with Tesla being the most prominent example. This concentration is not surprising: liquidity tends to accumulate in assets that retail investors already favor, and early adopters often use familiar high-beta stocks to test new infrastructure. Observation 2: Liquidity decreases on weekends Data shows that on-chain equity trading volume drops to 30% or less of weekday levels over the weekend. Unlike crypto-native assets, which trade seamlessly around the clock, tokenized stocks still inherit the behavioral inertia of traditional market trading hours. Traders appear less willing to trade when reference markets (such as Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange) are closed, likely due to concerns about arbitrage, price gaps, and the inability to hedge positions off-chain. Observation 3: Prices move in line with the Nasdaq Another key signal comes from pricing behavior during the initial launch period. Initially, xStocks tokens traded at a significant premium to their Nasdaq counterparts, reflecting market enthusiasm and potential friction in bridging fiat liquidity. However, these premiums gradually diminished over time. Current trading patterns show that the token price is at the upper limit of Tesla's intraday price range and is highly consistent with the Nasdaq reference price. Arbitrageurs appear to be maintaining this price discipline, but there are still small deviations from the intraday highs, indicating some market inefficiencies that may present opportunities and risks for active traders. New opportunities for Korean stock investors? South Korean investors currently hold over $100 billion in US stocks, with trading volume increasing 17-fold since January 2020. Existing infrastructure for South Korean investors to trade US stocks is limited by high fees, long settlement times, and slow cash-out processes, creating opportunities for tokenized or on-chain mirror stocks. As the infrastructure and platforms supporting on-chain US stock markets continue to improve, a new group of South Korean traders will enter the crypto market, which is undoubtedly a huge opportunity.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 08:00