Early on Jan. 3, reports said the United States carried out airstrikes inside Venezuela, with explosions reported in Caracas and nearby states. Venezuelan authoritiesEarly on Jan. 3, reports said the United States carried out airstrikes inside Venezuela, with explosions reported in Caracas and nearby states. Venezuelan authorities

Bitcoin Reacts to Venezuela Airstrike Reports as Geopolitical Risk Surges

Early on Jan. 3, reports said the United States carried out airstrikes inside Venezuela, with explosions reported in Caracas and nearby states. Venezuelan authorities accused Washington of hitting military-linked targets and announced emergency security measures after the blasts.

U.S. President Donald Trump later said Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured and flown out of the country following the operation. At the time of reporting, officials did not publish a detailed briefing that confirmed targets, timing, or the claim’s operational details.

Airspace warnings and flight restrictions also surfaced in early coverage. As a result, traders treated the headlines as an immediate macro risk event, even while many facts remained unsettled.

Bolivar Weakness and Dollar Pricing Fueled USDT Demand

Venezuela entered the latest shock with a fragile currency setup. The Venezuelan bolívar has faced repeated depreciation pressure, while many merchants price goods in U.S. dollars to avoid fast-changing local costs.

 USD/VES Exchange Rate Trend. Source: Trading Economics

That gap creates a daily conversion problem. People often earn or hold bolívars, yet they need dollars for rent, imports, and bigger purchases, so exchange rates matter even for routine spending.

In that environment, USDT has expanded as a “digital dollar” substitute for transfers and short-term savings. When cash USD gets scarce or risky to move, USDT can act as a bridge between bolívars and dollar-based pricing, including for business payments.

Bitcoin Price Mirrors Israel–Iran Headline Volatility

Bitcoin traded in a wide intraday range on Jan. 3, and the chart shows sharp swings instead of a one-way move. Price fell toward $88,600 in the late afternoon, then it rebounded fast and pushed above $90,500 in the evening. After that spike, Bitcoin drifted lower in choppy trading, and it later dipped again near $89,400 before stabilizing around $89,700.

Bitcoin (BTC) Intraday Price Chart (Jan. 3). Source: CoinCodex

The price action fits a risk-off, headline-driven tape because the moves came in quick bursts and then faded into sideways trade. However, this chart alone cannot confirm why the swings happened, and it also does not show stablecoin flows or derivatives positioning. It only shows spot price movement across the session.

During the opening phase of the Israel–Iran escalation, Bitcoin also swung sharply, with fast drops followed by quick rebounds. That kind of two-way tape often signals that traders react to headlines first, then reset positions as more information arrives. 

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0,002138
$0,002138$0,002138
+0,56%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

The rapid progress of quantum computing is forcing the cryptocurrency industry to confront the problem that has long been treated as theoretical. Blockchains th
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/30 22:53
The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

There are many paths to wealth in the modern economy, but the one Gurhan Kiziloz took stands out for a simple reason: he built everything himself. By 2026, the
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 23:07
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28