The post Aave DAO clashes with Aave Labs over CoW Swap fees and control of protocol IP appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave Labs and the Aave DAO battle overThe post Aave DAO clashes with Aave Labs over CoW Swap fees and control of protocol IP appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave Labs and the Aave DAO battle over

Aave DAO clashes with Aave Labs over CoW Swap fees and control of protocol IP

Aave Labs and the Aave DAO battle over CoW Swap fee flows, with delegates pushing to move all Aave IP, brand and frontend assets under direct tokenholder control.

Summary

  • CoW Swap fees on the Aave frontend flowed to an Aave Labs wallet, prompting accusations of “stealth privatization” and an estimated $10m in diverted annual revenue.​
  • Delegates proposed forcing transfer of Aave trademarks, domains, code and social accounts to the DAO, effectively turning Aave Labs into a DAO-owned subsidiary.​
  • Aave Labs countered that it owns the website and brand while the DAO owns smart contracts, before launching a holiday-period Snapshot vote that critics called rushed.

A governance dispute has emerged within the Aave protocol ecosystem, pitting the decentralized autonomous organization against Aave Labs over revenue distribution and asset ownership, according to public blockchain records and social media reports.

The conflict became public in December following a partnership announcement between Aave (AAVE) Labs and CoW Swap on December 4 to improve swap pricing and provide MEV protection on the Aave interface, according to statements from Aave Labs.

On December 11, a delegate published on-chain analysis indicating that swap fees from the new CoW Swap contract were being directed to a wallet controlled by Aave Labs rather than the DAO treasury, according to the published analysis. Marc Zeller, a delegate from Aave Chan Initiative, characterized the arrangement as “stealth privatization” and estimated approximately $10 million in annual revenue was not flowing to the DAO, according to statements posted on social media.

On December 16, a governance proposal emerged demanding transfer of all Aave intellectual property, code, and brand assets to DAO control, according to the proposal text. The measure would convert Aave Labs into a DAO-owned subsidiary and require return of past revenue earned using the Aave brand, according to the proposal terms.

A second proposal, introduced by a former chief technology officer of Aave Labs, argued that the DAO should own trademarks, domains, and social accounts if it funds development and marketing activities, according to the proposal documentation.

Aave Labs responded that the CoW Swap arrangement was not a fee switch and that frontend revenue represented a voluntary donation from the company, according to statements from the entity. The company maintained it is a private entity and that while the DAO owns smart contracts, Aave Labs retains ownership of the website and covers hosting, security, and frontend engineering costs, according to the company’s statements.

On December 23, Aave Labs initiated a Snapshot vote proposing to transfer control of brand assets, domains, social accounts, GitHub repositories, and npm packages to AAVE token holders, according to the voting platform. The former CTO stated he did not approve the vote and called the timing “disgraceful,” urging voters to abstain because discussions were ongoing, according to social media posts. Zeller raised concerns about the vote launching during the holiday period and noted that new delegations gained voting power shortly before the snapshot, according to his statements.

In other AAVE-related news, the company’s founder Stani Kulechov purchased has been on a purchasing spree of AAVE tokens, scooping up over $12 million USD worth of them in the past week.

The dispute raises questions about ownership structures in decentralized protocols, including control over code repositories, user interfaces, and brand assets, according to observers of the decentralized finance sector. The outcome may establish precedent for governance disputes in other DeFi protocols, according to industry analysts.

Aave Labs was founded by Stani Kulechov and operates as a centralized entity that develops infrastructure for the Aave protocol, according to company information. The Aave DAO represents token holders who govern the protocol through on-chain voting mechanisms.

AAVE is trading around $155–160 dollars today, versus roughly $308 at the start of 2025, down about 50% year to date.

Source: https://crypto.news/aave-dao-clashes-with-aave-labs-over-cow-swap-fees-and-control-of-protocol-ip/

Market Opportunity
AaveToken Logo
AaveToken Price(AAVE)
$139.75
$139.75$139.75
-0.04%
USD
AaveToken (AAVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

The post Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold surged over the $5,500-per-ounce milestone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 01:48
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40