When observing Bitcoin's performance in 2025, many people get caught up in simple price comparisons and don't understand why it underperformed the US stock marketWhen observing Bitcoin's performance in 2025, many people get caught up in simple price comparisons and don't understand why it underperformed the US stock market

2025 Asset Review: Why is Bitcoin significantly underperforming gold and US stocks?

2025/12/23 10:00

When observing Bitcoin's performance in 2025, many people get caught up in simple price comparisons and don't understand why it underperformed the US stock market led by Nvidia, or even the traditional safe-haven asset gold.

From a higher-dimensional perspective, this is actually a problem of physics and information theory. Price is just the surface; the underlying energy flow and information density are the essence.

1. The congestion effect of energy arbitrage: the shift in computing power hegemony

In Musk's logic, value is often linked to the efficiency of energy conversion. Over the past decade, Bitcoin has been the only machine capable of converting energy into scarce digital assets on a large scale, a value anchored based on thermodynamics.

But in 2024-2025, an extremely strong competitor emerged: generative artificial intelligence.

The core driver of the US stock market right now is not fiat currency inflation, but the exponential surge in total factor productivity (TFP) brought about by AI. When tech giants invest hundreds of billions of dollars in building data centers, they are essentially vying for global electricity quotas.

At the current stage, the economic added value generated by each kilowatt-hour of electricity used to train the next generation of large models or drive high-performance computing chips temporarily exceeds the revenue generated by hash collisions to produce Bitcoin. The difference in marginal revenue leads to the choice of price and capital. If you don't believe me, just look at how many Bitcoin mining farms have been converted into AI computing power centers.

Capital is profit-driven and sensitive. When the growth curve of silicon-based intelligence is steeper than the scarcity curve of "digital reserves," the excess global liquidity will preferentially flow to productive assets with non-linear growth potential, rather than simply digital assets.

2. Gold's "atomic properties" and Bitcoin's "code consensus"

Gold's strong performance this year is essentially a result of increased global geopolitical entropy.

Faced with deglobalization and systemic uncertainty, sovereign players need an asset that does not require network connectivity and does not rely on any clearing system. Under this extreme logic of systemic failure prevention, ancient gold provides certainty at the atomic level.

While Bitcoin is hailed as digital gold, it still heavily relies on internet infrastructure and centralized liquidity channels. When the system faces the risk of physical disconnection, atomic-level determinism triumphs over bit consensus in the short term; physical gold, at least, can be held in hand or stored away in a cave.

Gold hedges against system collapse, while Bitcoin is currently seen by the market more as an overflow of system liquidity.

3. The "volatility mitigation" brought about by ETFs

Tools determine behavior. The widespread adoption of Bitcoin spot ETFs marks the formal taming of this beast.

Once Bitcoin is incorporated into traditional asset allocation portfolios, it begins to follow traditional financial risk control models. While this provides long-term financial support, it also significantly smooths out its volatility, stifling its explosive potential.

Bitcoin is increasingly resembling a high-beta technology index. As the Federal Reserve maintains high interest rates for longer than the market expected, this highly liquidity-sensitive "long-tail asset" will naturally be suppressed.

4. The Siphon Effect of the Productivity Singularity on the Bitcoin Narrative

Charlie Munger emphasizes opportunity cost.

If holding shares in a leading AI company with a monopolistic position can yield highly certain non-linear growth, then holding Bitcoin, which does not generate cash flow, becomes extremely costly in terms of opportunity cost.

2025 marks the eve of a rare productivity singularity in human history, with all funds chasing the node that could potentially generate superintelligence. Bitcoin, as a "challenger to the monetary system," sees its appeal diminished in the short term in the face of this narrative of a productivity revolution.

5. Phase transition adjustment period in fractal structures

From the perspective of complex systems, the US stock market is in a phase of parabolic acceleration driven by AI.

In fractal geometry, tiny structures continuously replicate and amplify themselves through simple iterative formulas. AI is playing the role of this iterative operator. From the underlying NVIDIA computing power to the mid-layer cloud services and the upper-layer software applications, each layer is replicating the logic of "productivity explosion." This structure is extremely grand, but it also means that the system is approaching the physical limits of that local dimension.

Gold's role in the collapse of the old order can be understood through the construction process of a Cantor set, which involves continuously eliminating the middle third. In the current global financial fractal, what is being eliminated are "credit expansion," "unfulfilled promises," and "high-entropy debt."

As the old order is continuously shattered by debt crises and geopolitical turmoil, the last remaining set of unconnected but indestructible points is gold. This is a value density generated by "subtraction," the most stable physical foundation in fractal structures.

Bitcoin's current state is essentially the result of the hedging of forces at different scales: the profit-taking pressure from early participants offsets the continuous buying by sovereign nations and long-term funds over time, compressing the price into a long-term low-volatility range.

This prolonged period of low-frequency oscillation is dynamically known as the reconstruction of the "attractor".

This fractal system accumulates over time, reserving space for the next scale change.

Ultimately, Bitcoin in 2025 is not being disproven, but rather being repriced. It is temporarily giving way to the dual demands of a productivity singularity and geopolitical defense needs, bearing the cost of time rather than direction.

When the marginal efficiency of AI declines and liquidity continues to spill over, Bitcoin will return to its true role as a cross-cycle liquidity value carrier.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001433
$0.00000001433$0.00000001433
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. institutional demand falls as Asian markets buy Bitcoin dips, causing negative Coinbase premium.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/23 14:20
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

The post USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/JPY climbs to near 148.30 as Fed’s Powell didn’t endorse aggressive dovish stance. Fed’s Powell warns of slowing job demand and upside inflation risks. Japan’s Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI declines at a faster pace in September. The USD/JPY pair trades 0.45% higher to near 148.30 during the European trading session on Wednesday. The pair gains sharply as the US Dollar (USD) outperforms a majority of its peers, following comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell that the central bank needs to be cautious on further interest rate cuts. During the press time, the US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback’s value against six major currencies, rises almost 0.4% to near 97.60. The USD Index resumes its upside journey after a two-day corrective move. On Tuesday, Fed’s Powell stated at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce that the upside inflation risks and labor market concerns have posed a challenging situation for the central bank, which is prompting officials to exercise caution on further monetary policy easing. Powell also stated that the current interest rate range is “well positioned to respond to potential economic developments”. Fed Powell’s comments were similar to statements from Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack who stated on Monday that the central bank needs to cautious over unwinding monetary policy restrictiveness further, citing persistent inflation risks. Going forward, investors will focus on the US Durable Goods Orders and Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index (PCE) data for August, which will be released on Thursday and Friday, respectively. In Japan, the manufacturing business activity has declined again in September. Preliminary Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI data came in lower at 48.4 against 49.7 in August. Economists had anticipated the Manufacturing PMI to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/25 01:31