NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–On December 19, 2025, Grant & Eisenhower P.A. filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Paul Durkacz against the Canadian Imperial BankNEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–On December 19, 2025, Grant & Eisenhower P.A. filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Paul Durkacz against the Canadian Imperial Bank

Grant & Eisenhofer Files Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Royal Bank of Canada

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–On December 19, 2025, Grant & Eisenhower P.A. filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Paul Durkacz against the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) and Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), and their broker-dealer subsidiaries (together, the “Defendants”). The action alleges that Defendants defrauded investors by placing and executing manipulative trades designed to artificially deflate the price of Quantum stock.

The action is brought on behalf of all persons who sold securities of Quantum between January 6, 2021 and October 15, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”) and were damaged thereby. The action, brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, is captioned Paul Durkacz v. CIBC World Markets Inc., No. 1:25-cv-10565 (S.D.N.Y.).

CIBC and RBC are Canadian chartered banks whose U.S. subsidiaries are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and operate as major market makers, routinely placing and executing securities trades for investors as well as for their own trading accounts.

The complaint alleges violations of Sections 9, 10(b), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants engaged in a manipulative and illegal trading practice known as “spoofing,” which involves submitting and then cancelling buy or sell orders without any genuine intent to execute them. The purpose of these “baiting orders” was to mislead other market participants about the true level of supply and demand for Quantum securities, or about the stock’s price volatility, thereby influencing the market price of Quantum to benefit Defendants’ own trading positions.

Defendants entered thousands of these baiting orders on U.S. stock exchanges to create the false impression that Quantum’s stock price reflected genuine supply-and-demand and volatility dynamics, while simultaneously profiting by, among other things, purchasing Quantum securities at prices artificially depressed by their manipulative and deceptive conduct.

Investors who sold Quantum securities during the Class Period are members of this proposed Class and may be able to seek appointment as lead plaintiff, which is a court-appointed representative of the Class, by complying with the relevant provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). See 15 U.S.C. Section 78u-4(a)(2)(A)(i)-(vi).

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court by no later than February 20, 2026. You do not need to seek to become a lead plaintiff in order to share in any possible recovery. You may also retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action.

If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Abe Alexander at Grant & Eisenhofer at 646-722-8500, or via email at aalexander@gelaw.com.

Contacts

Media Contact:

Abe Alexander

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.

Tel.: (646) 722-8500

aalexander@gelaw.com

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.04915
$0.04915$0.04915
+6.04%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

PANews reported on December 23 that, according to Globenewswire, Nasdaq-listed e-commerce and supply chain platform iPower announced it has reached a $30 million
Share
PANews2025/12/23 22:19
SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SHENZHEN, China–(BUSINESS WIRE)–SelectCam AI, a China-based, product-driven technology company, today announced the launch of its flagship AI video telematics solutions
Share
AI Journal2025/12/23 21:48