The post Bitcoin Mining Became a 24/7 Nightmare For This Texas County appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A 4-year-long dispute between residents of rural HoodThe post Bitcoin Mining Became a 24/7 Nightmare For This Texas County appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A 4-year-long dispute between residents of rural Hood

Bitcoin Mining Became a 24/7 Nightmare For This Texas County

A 4-year-long dispute between residents of rural Hood County and a nearby Bitcoin mining operation has exposed the social costs of Texas’ crypto boom. Homeowners turned against one of the state’s largest digital-asset miners.

At the center of the conflict is a large Bitcoin mine operated by MARA Holdings near Granbury in unincorporated Hood County.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Bitcoin Mining Becomes a Constant Mental Torture

Neighbors say a constant, low-frequency hum from the facility’s cooling systems has turned daily life into what they describe as a never-ending ordeal. MARA (formerly Marathon Digital) says it operates legally, brings investment and jobs, and has taken steps to reduce noise.

The mine began operating in 2022 next to a natural-gas power plant outside Granbury. Residents soon reported round-the-clock noise, likening it to “standing on a runway” or “the edge of Niagara Falls.” Complaints intensified through 2023 as the site expanded.

A Resident’s Comment on the Hood County Bitcoin Mining Situation

Texas Crypto Boom Meets Local Limits

Texas has become the largest Bitcoin mining hub in the United States, hosting close to 30% of national mining power by 2023, drawn by cheap land, low taxes, and a deregulated power market.

That growth has collided with a key legal reality. Counties in Texas generally cannot pass enforceable noise ordinances. Only cities can.

Hood County officials attempted to use state “unreasonable noise” statutes in 2024, issuing citations tied to high decibel thresholds.

However, the effort faltered in court, showing how narrow those laws are compared with typical municipal noise limits.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Lawsuits and Sound Studies

Residents organized and filed a private nuisance lawsuit in state court, arguing that the mine’s noise and vibration substantially interfere with their use of their homes. 

The case remains active, with disputes over access to operational data and measurements.

Separately, Hood County commissioned an independent sound study in late 2024. The report documented elevated sound levels near the site and emphasized that the legal threshold used in criminal law is far more permissive than city noise standards elsewhere. 

Sponsored

Sponsored

The study also noted limits in access and coordination, which prevented a full assessment under all operating conditions.

Bitcoin Mining Hashrate World Map. Source: Chain Bulletin

MARA says it has invested heavily to mitigate impacts. The company built a large acoustic barrier wall, replaced some cooling fans with quieter models, and began transitioning parts of the site to liquid immersion cooling. 

In a statement cited by Al Jazeera, MARA said it has invested more than $320 million locally, supports dozens of jobs, generates tax revenue, and “remain[s] committed to being good neighbors.”

For residents, those steps have not gone far enough. 

Sponsored

Sponsored

A Failed Bid for Cityhood

In 2025, residents pursued a last-ditch strategy. They wanted to incorporate their community as a city, which would have allowed them to enact local noise laws.

The effort drew national attention and legal pushback from MARA, but a judge allowed the vote to proceed. Voters ultimately rejected incorporation, ending the bid to gain municipal authority.

With incorporation off the table, residents say they will continue to fight through the courts. 

Source: https://beincrypto.com/marathon-digital-bitcoin-mining-texas-hood-county-crisis/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41