We have seen a significant rise in the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s (BIR) revenue collection targets over the years, as the government’s budget requirements continue to grow. While these targets are primarily achieved through voluntary tax compliance, a sizeable chunk of this can also be attributed to payment of deficiency taxes arising from enforcement actions […]We have seen a significant rise in the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s (BIR) revenue collection targets over the years, as the government’s budget requirements continue to grow. While these targets are primarily achieved through voluntary tax compliance, a sizeable chunk of this can also be attributed to payment of deficiency taxes arising from enforcement actions […]

A welcome relief: BIR suspends audit and field audit operations

We have seen a significant rise in the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s (BIR) revenue collection targets over the years, as the government’s budget requirements continue to grow. While these targets are primarily achieved through voluntary tax compliance, a sizeable chunk of this can also be attributed to payment of deficiency taxes arising from enforcement actions or assessments.   

The tax assessment process commences from the taxpayer’s receipt of a Letter of Authority (LoA), which authorizes revenue officers to examine the books of account and other records of a taxpayer. This is likely familiar to most taxpayers— whether large or small. While taxpayers typically receive one LoA in a year, there are some cases where multiple LoAs for different taxable years arrive within the same calendar year, forcing businesses to juggle year-end compliance alongside ongoing audits.

Tax assessments have recently been in the spotlight, amidst several issues raised by legislators on the use of government funds. Due to taxpayer complaints about excessive and irregular LoAs, a proposed resolution was filed in the Senate urging the chamber “to investigate the allegations of misuse of LoAs by the BIR as a money-making scheme.” These practices have also raised concerns among taxpayers about the frequency of LoAs and inconsistencies in tax audit handling, which allegedly include varying interpretations of the tax rules by different revenue officers.

In response to the concerns raised and amid the looming Senate probe, the BIR’s newly appointed Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) issued Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 107-2025 on Nov. 24, suspending all audit and other field operations effective immediately.

The suspension applies to all BIR operating offices and covers the issuance of LoAs, Mission Orders (MOs), examination and verification of taxpayer records, and related transactions. It also includes revalidation, extension, replacement, or supplementary LoAs and MOs—except in cases falling under specified exceptions.

Except for certain circumstances, the (1) issuance of written orders to audit or investigate taxpayers’ internal revenue liabilities, and (2) issuance of Assessment Notices, Warrants, and Seizure Notices are likewise suspended. The RMC lists six exceptions to the suspension, such as investigation of cases prescribing within six months from the date of the RMC; transfers of real properties or shares of stocks; issuance of LoAs or MOs necessary for active criminal probes; and other matters/concerns where deadlines have been imposed or under the order of the CIR, among others. Thus, while the RMC offers reprieve to most, it is not a total ceasefire from the BIR – taxpayers would do well to revisit whether their ongoing cases fall under these exceptions to avoid any untoward surprises.

While the RMC provides that the exceptions include cases prescribing within the coming six-month period, it is not too clear on which prescriptive period the six-month period would be based on. Most LoAs cover all internal revenue taxes, and considering that different tax types have varying prescriptive periods, some tax types may be prescribing within the period of exception (such as withholding taxes), while other tax types may be beyond the period. In my experience, BIR officers generally compute the three-year prescriptive period for tax assessment from the actual or prescribed date of filing the income tax return. It would be helpful for the BIR to confirm whether the same approach also applies for the said exception.

Notably, the RMC did not explicitly mention the suspension of the issuance of the Final Decision on Disputed Assessment (FDDA). While the FDDA similarly demands the payment of the deficiency taxes, it is a decision based on the taxpayers’ response to the Final Assessment Notice (FAN), the latter of which is the result of the BIR’s conduct of its audit and investigation. In preparing the FDDA, the BIR evaluates the taxpayer’s protest instead of conducting fieldwork/audit. It may thus be inferred that the BIR will continue issuing FDDAs in cases where the statutory period for filing a protest letter or submission of the additional documents has lapsed.

It is also worth pointing out that aside from the suspension of the audit and field audit operations, the RMC also provided specific directives under Section 5. In the past, the BIR has also suspended the field audit and other field operations with no mention of the purpose for the suspension and the next steps to be taken during the suspension of audit.

This time, the BIR explained that the suspension was imposed in order to address systematic issues, protect taxpayer rights, and develop a transparent, standardized, and modernized audit framework. Thus, to achieve this, the CIR ordered the creation of a Technical Working Group or Review Committee on LoA and MO Integrity and Audit Reforms, which is tasked with evaluating the existing tax audit frameworks and recommend a revised protocol for LoA issuance, among others.

With the year drawing to a close and taxpayers preparing for their year-end compliance, the suspension of audit and field audit operations offers welcome relief, by providing assurance that no new LoAs will be issued until the lifting has been ordered by the CIR. Maybe adding to their holiday wish list, a taxpayer would also earnestly hope that the suspension does not represent the end of the BIR’s action in addressing taxpayer concerns but the start of a complete reform of the tax audit process.

As a further step, beyond clarifying the exceptions and the scope of suspension, I hope that the BIR will revisit the current rules and policies on the tax audit process, particularly those governing assessment notices. This would help address taxpayer concerns regarding disparities in the interpretation of the tax audit rules. By doing so, taxpayers would be better informed about the process and avoid potential due process violations, while improving transparency and accountability. 

Ultimately, while tax audits serve as one of the BIR’s sources of revenue, the goal remains to encourage compliance with tax laws and regulations. Perhaps, a revamped LoA issuance protocol —and, ideally, a comprehensive reform of the tax audit process—could help the government achieve its annual revenue targets mostly through voluntary tax compliance.

The views or opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Isla Lipana & Co. The content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for specific advice.

Maryanne Patricia P. Uno is a manager at the Tax Services department of Isla Lipana & Co. the Philippine member firm of the PwC network.

+63 (2) 8845-2728

maryanne.patricia.uno@pwc.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Moto completes $1.8 million pre-seed funding round for its Solana eco-credit card project.

Moto completes $1.8 million pre-seed funding round for its Solana eco-credit card project.

PANews reported on December 17th that Moto, an on-chain credit card project, announced the completion of a $1.8 million Pre-Seed funding round, led by Eterna Capital
Share
PANews2025/12/17 22:15
Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales offload 200 million XRP leaving market uncertainty behind. XRP faces potential collapse as whales drive major price shifts. Is XRP’s future in danger after massive sell-off by whales? XRP’s price has been under intense pressure recently as whales reportedly offloaded a staggering 200 million XRP over the past two weeks. This massive sell-off has raised alarms across the cryptocurrency community, as many wonder if the market is on the brink of collapse or just undergoing a temporary correction. According to crypto analyst Ali (@ali_charts), this surge in whale activity correlates directly with the price fluctuations seen in the past few weeks. XRP experienced a sharp spike in late July and early August, but the price quickly reversed as whales began to sell their holdings in large quantities. The increased volume during this period highlights the intensity of the sell-off, leaving many traders to question the future of XRP’s value. Whales have offloaded around 200 million $XRP in the last two weeks! pic.twitter.com/MiSQPpDwZM — Ali (@ali_charts) September 17, 2025 Also Read: Shiba Inu’s Price Is at a Tipping Point: Will It Break or Crash Soon? Can XRP Recover or Is a Bigger Decline Ahead? As the market absorbs the effects of the whale offload, technical indicators suggest that XRP may be facing a period of consolidation. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), currently sitting at 53.05, signals a neutral market stance, indicating that XRP could move in either direction. This leaves traders uncertain whether the XRP will break above its current resistance levels or continue to fall as more whales sell off their holdings. Source: Tradingview Additionally, the Bollinger Bands, suggest that XRP is nearing the upper limits of its range. This often points to a potential slowdown or pullback in price, further raising concerns about the future direction of the XRP. With the price currently around $3.02, many are questioning whether XRP can regain its footing or if it will continue to decline. The Aftermath of Whale Activity: Is XRP’s Future in Danger? Despite the large sell-off, XRP is not yet showing signs of total collapse. However, the market remains fragile, and the price is likely to remain volatile in the coming days. With whales continuing to influence price movements, many investors are watching closely to see if this trend will reverse or intensify. The coming weeks will be critical for determining whether XRP can stabilize or face further declines. The combination of whale offloading and technical indicators suggest that XRP’s price is at a crossroads. Traders and investors alike are waiting for clear signals to determine if the XRP will bounce back or continue its downward trajectory. Also Read: Metaplanet’s Bold Move: $15M U.S. Subsidiary to Supercharge Bitcoin Strategy The post Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse? appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/17 23:42
Theta Labs faces lawsuits over CEO’s alleged insider token manipulation

Theta Labs faces lawsuits over CEO’s alleged insider token manipulation

The post Theta Labs faces lawsuits over CEO’s alleged insider token manipulation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Theta Labs has been sued by two former senior
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 22:03